The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 08:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)reply
A fifth-tier amateur football club, references in the article are to seemingly
unreliable sources, with one of them being a Facebook link and none of them being inline. Doesn't seem to satisfy
WP:GNG,
WP:ORG and—although it's an essay—
WP:FOOTYN#Club notability. Regards,
SshibumXZ (
talk·contribs). 20:59, 12 September 2018 (UTC); edited 21:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC).reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:56, 12 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - as an amature club founded only earlier this year, it is likely to be a while before any reliable coverage emerges. As the nominator stated article failed Wikipedia's guidelines at the moment.
Inter&anthro (
talk) 00:36, 13 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - no evidence of notability.
GiantSnowman 14:20, 13 September 2018 (UTC)reply
That makes sense. But if you do initiate the AfDs, please make them separate nominations, as coverage of each of these clubs varies. --
Paul_012 (
talk) 05:36, 15 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.