The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Lara❤Love 14:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete. Problems tagged in January, nothing improved since then. No evidence of any notability, no sources.
Fram (
talk) 13:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete I agree lack of notability and no credible third person sources
Dwanyewest (
talk) 06:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)reply
It is custom that you don't !vote on your own nominations. It gives the impression that there are currently two persons agreeing with your nomination, while in fact only one editor has responded. If you do need to reply, it is better not to bold anything in your response, or to indicate it as a comment or so.
Fram (
talk) 07:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.