The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
PROD contested, no reason provided. Original rationale remains valid - this young player has not received significant coverage (failing
WP:GNG) and has not played in a
fully-professional league (failing
WP:NFOOTBALL).
GiantSnowman 08:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
GiantSnowman 08:50, 16 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete - per GS, has not played in a FPL or played senior international football.
Fenix down (
talk) 12:53, 16 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails
WP:NSPORT and
WP:GNG.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 14:47, 16 October 2013 (UTC)reply
I can think the authors uses the data that is correct actually and person ( minus,erase ) show the referent that don't suit the reason such as , he is person play , fully league , then get ( minus,erase ) which , be lieeing has and to oppose at the authors write. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kengi1982 (
talk •
contribs)
Delete per nom as this individual hasn't had a significant football career. C679 15:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.