From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 12:12, 31 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Proposed New England Revolution South Boston stadium

Proposed New England Revolution South Boston stadium (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the proposal has been covered in independent secondary reliable sources, "speculation and rumor, even from reliable sources, are not appropriate encyclopedic content". It is too soon to for it to have its own article, as it has not received coverage outside of a brief news cycle (All of the reliable sources I could find were from November 18 and November 19). Although the proposal may eventually receive enough coverage to warrant an article, Wikipedia does not predict the future. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 06:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 06:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 10:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 10:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 10:26, 23 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - WP:CRYSTAL; this has no information and no notability. Giant Snowman 11:40, 23 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. This article is pure speculation, and there is nothing to indicate why this stadium is currently notable. If it is built sometime in the future and happens to receive widespread coverage, perhaps the article can be recreated. -- Biblio worm 17:15, 23 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Way to early and no official word yet from the Kraft family. -- ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 20:53, 24 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete a clear cut case of WP:CRYSTAL. The thing doesn't even have a name yet. Dea db eef 08:54, 25 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - If the stadium had actually been greenlit, this article would have some merit, but it's merely been proposed, and we can't very well have articles for stadia that are merely proposed, can we? – Pee Jay 23:51, 26 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Merge There is no reason that this information cannot be merged into an article on the team itself, and split back out at a later date if it is ever built. We have many proposed stadium articles, but many of them have a wide-range of sources. Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 14:56, 27 December 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.