The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 2:1, but the one "keep" isn't very convincing.  Sandstein  09:36, 22 December 2015 (UTC) reply

PropertyGuru Malaysia

PropertyGuru Malaysia (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable, promotional, and cannot be verified. The only actually accessible sites are the company's own pages, and its self-writen description on Bloomberg. Everything else is a dead link. (ref 8 is a specialist paid site, but it looks like it too would be a directory entry) DGG ( talk ) 03:53, 30 November 2015 (UTC) reply

• Keep
  • cannot be verified
    • http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=81851546888
    • http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/property/213560-msia-is-increasingly-popular-among-foreign-property-buyers.html
    • https://www.yahoo.com/?err=404&err_url=http%3a%2f%2fnews.yahoo.com%2fpropertyguru-secures-major-strategic-investment-immobilienscout24-subsidiary-deutsche-070359588.html
    • http://www.propertyportalwatch.com/subscribe/?_s2member_vars=catg..level..0..post..29224..LzIwMTIvMDQvdG9wLXByb3BlcnR5LXBvcnRhbHMtaW4tbWFsYXlzaWEv&_s2member_sig=1448918095-f2429912957cd90d22fde2cb47e39e79
  • promotional
    • Personally I find it informative. Ottawahitech ( talk) 21:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)please ping me reply

I've already commented on the problems of some of these sites. DGG ( talk ) 07:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Human3015 ^TALK  21:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Human3015 ^TALK  21:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Human3015 ^TALK  21:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Can't see enough in-depth coverage to show notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.