The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:NFOOTY as not played professional. Only a trial with Hibs and never started for the Wellington Phoenix. Team Wellington doesn't play in a professional league. Not enough for
WP:GNG.
Edit as I see this is third nominations, I'm surprised it was kept in the previous ones but note both where no concensus. Really all the articles are the same thing about his trial and he hasn't gone on to do anything else and/or play professional. NZFC(talk)(cont) 01:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:NFOOTY as I can not find him going onto the field for a pro team.
WP:GNG is harder. But if you don't reach football notability, you can't reach general notability for your football. (
Dushan Jugum (
talk) 04:51, 9 January 2019 (UTC)).reply
Delete As I cannot find reliable coverage which I am going to agree with these two, the article fails
WP:NFOOTBALL and
WP:GNG.
Sheldybett (
talk) 09:45, 10 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
GiantSnowman 11:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - no evidence of notability, fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NFOOTBALL. I wasn't convinced about the GNG arguments at the last AFD and I'm still not.
GiantSnowman 11:50, 14 January 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.