The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 23:48, 27 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 23:46, 14 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom; non-notable manager.
GiantSnowman 16:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep. A quick
Google search gives us some substantial coverage from sources such as
The Independent and
The Times. There's plenty of scope for this article to be improved, what with him being the guy who brought Gazza to Kettering and all.
Bettia(bring on the trumpets!) 11:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ron Ritzman (
talk) 00:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete non-notable football manager of amateur clubs. Amateur footballers are non-notable, so managers are. --
Angelo (
talk) 08:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment He has some notability from the Gazza deal (which seems to have coincided with him selling Kettering) and there's the Independent article which is basically about him. The Times article does point out he saved the club from liquidation, but is largely about Gazza. He is also involved with
Footballcv.com. The company's wikilink may need deleting, but it does make some claims of notability, although I'm not sure if these are genuine or if the 'as featured on/in' are simply puff pieces. Still not sure that means he needs an article though
Stu.W UK (
talk) 09:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Sources should be third-party, reliable and cover the subject in detail. This is not the case, since Mallinger's name is mentioned mostly in sources regarding Gascoigne's time with Kettering, where Gascoigne is the main subject, not Mallinger. --
Angelo (
talk) 10:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.