The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 06:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Unsourced. Trivial and non-notable. Fails
WP:GNG. Also see
WP:SPORTCRIT. Full of redlinks and broken templates. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left.
Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
I'm neutral on this one. This is about what the playoffs are in general rather than a lot of cruft about specific results. It could be a merge target for what little info in the articles about the specific playoffs is worth keeping and can be reliably referenced. I'm not !voting keep on something completely unreferenced but I'm not !voting delete either as unreferenced stubs are legitimate. I don't hold out great hopes that anybody will want to improve this article but there is no harm in leaving that option open. --
DanielRigal (
talk) 14:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 16:36, 12 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
T. Canens (
talk) 18:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Per above and fails
WP:GNG. Very little/no information to warrant a merge.
GauchoDude (
talk) 21:17, 26 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.