- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America 1000 05:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Oliver Rothschild
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Oliver Rothschild ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PEOPLE. I quote: "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be 'worthy of notice' or 'note'—that is, 'remarkable' or 'significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded' within Wikipedia as a written account of that person's life." Bishonen | talk 22:04, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG. The sources comprise a press release written by a promoter, an entry at Companies House, a staff list at a University website, and a couple of dead links that I've been unable to resurrect. I've got more significant coverage in independent sources than he has, and I'm about as unnotable as it's possible to be. -- RexxS ( talk) 22:53, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka ( talk) 23:35, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka ( talk) 23:35, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Notability is not satisfied. The links show nothing useful and searches show more of the same. I can't tell if the article was created as a promotion or an attack ("Reports Of Misrepresentation") but neither would be useful. Johnuniq ( talk) 00:41, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable businessman. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:05, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete can’t be bothered to search the history to see if this page is an attack or vanity, but either ways, it is non notable and of interest to no one. Giano (talk) 19:45, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Appears to have originally created as a promotional article (the original editor never edited again, after having created two articles - which is practically the modus operandi of many paid editors of the era). Notability not satisfied, fails GNG. Risker ( talk) 22:31, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- 1l2l3k ( talk) 21:46, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.