No RfXs since 18:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC).— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online |
|
Hi 1l2l3k! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC) |
I hope you're going to contribute to the articles on enwiki too.-- Udha ( talk) 16:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:14th-century establishments in Albania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Fayenatic London 15:04, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, 1l2l3k. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St. Paraskevi's Church, Çetë, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naos ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:30, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles W. Kingston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Davis County ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:07, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Because you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alefosio Laki, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie Aiono. Papaursa ( talk) 00:01, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi 1l2l3k. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right may be revoked by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 02:27, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Per this request,
[1] I spotted it on Gerda's talk page on my watchlist so I just went ahead and userfied it for you at
User:1l2l3k/Martin Gjoka. Not that there's too much of interest there, it's just a one-liner
—
Amakuru (
talk) 21:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
@ 1l2l3k:, thank you for reviewing Wermund Bendtsen on which you have placed a notability query. May I ask you to reconsider that template? I am in the process of chasing up all the photographers included in The Family of Man exhibition which was seen by 9 million visitors on its world tour in the 1950s. Knowledge of every photographer in the exhibition will be of value to researchers in the ongoing evaluation of this ground-breaking photography exhibition. Bendtsen was the sole Danish photographer included. For that reason and because as a result of his contribution to that exhibition he is now represented at Museum of Modern Art and at Clervaux Castle as well as having a collection at the Danish Archives. Certainly the record of his early life (at least amongst English sources - I don't speak Danish) is scant prior to his becoming a photographer, but he was evidently prominent in Denmark once he started operating professionally. His production of films (as cinematographer and director of photography) and of picture books is ample: equal to and greater than comparable photographers whose bios are on WP, American Nell Dorr for example, around whom there is no such query about notability. Thank you for your consideration of my request. Jamesmcardle (talk) 01:15, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- @
Jamesmcardle: I had tagged for notability mostly to grab your attention in regards, as I DID mark "reviewed" anyways, and it seems like I succeeded in having that attention, :-). After reading your request above I will AGF your sources and removed the notability tag. I'll leave the other, source improvement tag, though, as we don't have a death date and we are unsure if this is a BLP article or not. I will leave it up to you to remove that too, once you clarify the death year, and determine whether this person is still alive. Other improvements can be made too. --
1l2l3k (
talk) 12:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- @ 1l2l3k:, thank you for drawing my attention and for your quick amendment, and yes, I understand the date of death needs urgent fixing, so will keep working on this article. All the best, Jamesmcardle (talk) 23:02, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing Blackened death metal, 1l2l3k.
Unfortunately Barkeep49 has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
Marking as unreviewed since this isn't eligible for G4 csd and review status happened automatically. Feel free to mark it reviewed if you think appropriate.
To reply, leave a comment on Barkeep49's talk page.
Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:45, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
-
Barkeep49 I think that page can eventually stay, as it was improved, so I put something in the talk page in regard, as well as added the banners. Consensus can change over time. Considering the improvements, if someone brings to AFD, I will consider voting "keep". --
1l2l3k (
talk) 16:00, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- I agree it was improved substantially. I wasn't interested in reviewing the sources but am not surprised someone who did marked it as patrolled. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 16:02, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
-
Barkeep49 Haha, that someone marking "reviewed" was me, but I needed you pulling my ear with that removal of CSD, which made me check the version of 2008. --
1l2l3k (
talk) 16:03, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Yes I knew in this instance it was you :). BTW if you patrol the "oldest" end of the log you might be interested in the workflow I've made sorry if I've suggested this your way already. One important thing I've found that isn't true when patrolling the newest end is really investigating the history of the page before trying to do any other NPP steps. Hope you find the workflow helpful and if you think there any additions/changes feel free to make them. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 16:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, this will be useful. Nice work, btw! -- 1l2l3k ( talk) 16:21, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
-
Barkeep49 Haha, that someone marking "reviewed" was me, but I needed you pulling my ear with that removal of CSD, which made me check the version of 2008. --
1l2l3k (
talk) 16:03, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- I agree it was improved substantially. I wasn't interested in reviewing the sources but am not surprised someone who did marked it as patrolled. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 16:02, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Template:Did you know nominations/Alfons Tracki at the
Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in
step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{
db-g7}}, or ask a
DYK admin. Thank you.
DYKHousekeepingBot (
talk) 06:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Template:Did you know nominations/Summer Theatre of Tirana at the
Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in
step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{
db-g7}}, or ask a
DYK admin. Thank you.
DYKHousekeepingBot (
talk) 06:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Ramiz Kovaçi at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 20:19, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Nice to see a participant in AfD taking the time and making the effort to find sources on an historical figure. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 13:55, 10 August 2018 (UTC) |
Thank you for the encouragement! The article has already been nominated by User:Catrìona at Template:Did you know nominations/Murder of the family of Robert Einstein. Turismond ( talk) 06:34, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
On 21 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alfons Tracki, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alfons Tracki (pictured), a German-Albanian Christian martyr, worked to eradicate Gjakmarrja (blood feuds) from Northern Albania? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alfons Tracki. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Alfons Tracki), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Precious
people who shaped Albania
Thank you for quality biographies of people working in Albania, such as Alfons Tracki, Ramiz Kovaçi and Gaqo Çako, for your plans for 40 martyrs from Albania, for searching for references to rescue an article, for collaboration, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
A year ago, you were recipient no. 2005 of Precious, a prize of QAI! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Might want to check the edit history before leaving comments. :-) -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Dear @
SarekOfVulcan:, I did check the history, and marked as reviewed. Those tags are necessary in general, as the author of the article is reminded to improve the article, as much as possible. Still, I removed a couple of tags. Although necessary, I don't want to be perceived as a tag bomber, and I don't want to scare too much the author, rather help, but I did leave the 1 source thing, and I had also sent a message in his talkpage. Is there anything in particular that you would have done better in your review? --
1l2l3k (
talk) 20:04, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Well, personally, I would have probably tagged the person who changed the redirect into an article today, instead of the person who created the redirect 14 years ago. --
SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- @
SarekOfVulcan: You're right. It had fooled me that the person who created the redirect is still active (last edit was less than a week ago). I
followed your suggestion. Too many edits today. Be well, and thanks for dropping by my page. --
1l2l3k (
talk) 20:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. :-) You have a great one too! -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:47, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- @
SarekOfVulcan: You're right. It had fooled me that the person who created the redirect is still active (last edit was less than a week ago). I
followed your suggestion. Too many edits today. Be well, and thanks for dropping by my page. --
1l2l3k (
talk) 20:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Well, personally, I would have probably tagged the person who changed the redirect into an article today, instead of the person who created the redirect 14 years ago. --
SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Jordan Misja Artistic Lyceum at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk) 21:29, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
On 26 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Summer Theatre of Tirana, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after being rebuilt in May 2018, the open-air Summer Theatre of Tirana held a show in which 400 artists participated? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Summer Theatre of Tirana. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Summer Theatre of Tirana), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
On 30 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gaqo Çako, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gaqo Çako was the lead tenor for more than three decades at the National Theatre of Opera and Ballet of Albania? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gaqo Çako. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Gaqo Çako), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Ritchie333 00:02, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Please see note on your DYK review. The article was really hard to read; didn't you notice that? Yoninah ( talk) 23:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
On 4 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ramiz Kovaçi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ramiz Kovaçi, a baritone at the National Theatre of Opera and Ballet of Albania, was also a jury member for a light music festival? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ramiz Kovaçi. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Ramiz Kovaçi), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
On 5 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jordan Misja Artistic Lyceum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Jordan Misja Artistic Lyceum in Tirana counts among its alumni most Albanian professional artists, as well as the current Prime Minister of Albania? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jordan Misja Artistic Lyceum. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Jordan Misja Artistic Lyceum), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.
- Project news
- The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
- As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.
- There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination#Coordinator tasks for more info to see if you can help out.
- Other
- A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.
- Moving to Draft and Page Mover
- Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
- If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
- Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
- The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js( info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
- The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing
|
|---|
|
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
|
Hello 1l2l3k, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
- Backlog
As of 21 October 2018 [update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
- Community Wishlist Proposal
- There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
- Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!
- Project updates
- ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
- There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.
- New scripts
- User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js( info) — A new script created for quickly placing {{ copyvio-revdel}} on a page.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
I have extended your membertship of the Nerw Page Reviewer group indefinitely. Please review as many pages as you can, as often as you can.
Just as important right now is that you turn out to vote at the Wishlist for the
Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements. Voting takes place 16 to 30 November . See also The Signpost special report:
NPP needs You.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk) 17:51, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey, I just saw your edit summaries over at Mohamad Safa mentioning that "tags aren't helpful", and I wanted to ask why you felt this way. Personally, especially when editing from the back if the NPP queue, I find that tags, and particularly the notability tag are very useful both for quickly identifying at a glance whether an article has received any attention from another editor that isn't a major contributor, as well as a warning to editors that the article may soon be nominated for deletion if sourcing is not improved. If no one touches the article for several days after, I consider it safe to proceed with PROD or draftifying without fear of biting the initial editor. In the specific case of Mohamad Safa, I wasn't able to conclusively determine from translations that the Arabic sources weren't sufficient to meet GNG and thus didn't want to nominate for deletion, but nevertheless was highly skeptical of their quality and was further concerned that the subject's claim to fame appeared to be as a representative from an apparently non-notable NGO to the UN.
At any rate, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on tag use while patrolling.signed, Rosguill talk 01:21, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- I'm glad it caught your attention. I think that reviewers should really do the research on notability of each article and make a decision, otherwise another reviewer will need to go through the same path. It may take reviewing less articles, but a decision needs to be made. A tag on the potential issues of notability of an article is really not helpful; you already know that if the article has not been reviewed yet, it is likely because it's difficult to determine notability. Again, nothing personal, but I LOVE TO SEE DECISIVENESS. -- 1l2l3k ( talk) 01:53, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
I reported you to AE for violation of WIkipedia policy for undoing my edits. AND you falsely stated that I wasn't involved in the talk page, where I clearly was. Gobulls ( talk) 17:33, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- You made a mistake. My reverts are at a distance of 4 days, not 24 hours. You'll learn. -- 1l2l3k ( talk) 17:58, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Per your advice I have made changes in the article” Baskut Tuncak” which you put on list for deletion. It was actually good and I thank you for directing me to improve the article. I appreciate if you could remove the deletion tag. I hope to have more guidance from you in the future. Thank you again, Alex-h ( talk) 23:56, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
- Can't move the deletion tag, as it's being discussed right now, and I see a user already voting "delete" so even if I wanted to, that would not be permitted. -- 1l2l3k ( talk) 16:16, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
While the article you proposed for speedy deletion was pretty poor I don't think this was an appropriate course of action for such an obviously substantial organisation. Rathfelder ( talk) 23:53, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe so, but this editor had the same thoughts as me. I see it expanded now, which is great. Sometimes questionable actions suscitate great edits. At this point I would vote for a keep. -- 1l2l3k ( talk) 10:00, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi there,
I guess you noticed it shortly after reverting me, but I wasn't the person who removed the redirect, I was just gnoming :-D
Anyway, good on you for reinstating the redirect. That "article" was dubious at best. -- Slashme ( talk) 11:52, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. |
Hello 1l2l3k,
- Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
- Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.
- If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.
- We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.
- With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here)18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, The article Baskut Tuncak that you put on deletion list, I have edited a few times, in total I have put more than 23 sources. His UN mandate was renewed in September 2017 for another 3 years. Is there anything else I need to do about this article? If not, I request that now after 12 days, you kindly remove the deletion tag. Thank you once again for improving my article. Alex-h ( talk) 21:50, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, 1l2l3k. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, 1l2l3k. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thank you very much for your comment and assistance on Giuseppe G Ruisi.
/info/en/?search=Giuseppe_G._Ruisi Josephintechnicolor ( talk) 10:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC) |
Discretionary sanctions notice: post-1932 politics of the United States and biographies of living persons
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
— Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 17:16, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Greetings. Please do not use the talk page to post your personal commentary about Sarsour's "unconventional" views or any other topic. BLP policy applies to talk pages as well as articles; any contentious material about living persons that is not directly supported by a published, reliable source may be removed. Please also note that multiple sets of discretionary sanctions apply to this article and its talk page. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 17:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
- You are misinterpreting policies, Sang: hiding against them, you are shutting me off from the relative talk pages. Your bullying tactics will be reported. --
1l2l3k (
talk) 18:02, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
- Please do so. Then it can be explained to you in detail why saying that "In classical Islamic law, the term often refers to armed struggle against unbelievers'" followed by "(Sarsour) says Jihad should be used against people in the White House" amounts to a very selective interpretation of the source material and verges on character assassination of a living person. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 18:16, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Any material dealing with Hamas and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in general falls under WP:1RR. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 18:30, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for moving this page forward. Under WP:MILUNIT consensus at the Milhist project would deem it notable, but at present nobody's dug up the sources - have to go to Baton Rouge for the full answers - to provide the details and sources, though the U.S. Army Lineage Series on Military Police would help. Thus for the moment I have upmerged the article to Louisiana Army National Guard and reduced it to a redirect with a category. Feel free to come back to me with comments/disagreements. Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 10:24, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Only wikilinks render as wikilinks in edit summaries. Everything else is just raw text. wumbolo ^^^ 21:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
— MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 23:07, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- Checking your contributions is a good thing for Wiki, not a bad one. -- 1l2l3k ( talk) 23:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
If you haven't read it yet, now's a good time. AGF — MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 23:17, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- I read it, and if the IP makes a useful addition not necessarily we need to revert it. The contribution was backed by a source. We keep a bunch of material in wikipedia that was added by users that are blocked or banned. How about you read the fifth pillar? We are merely trying to get to the best writing possible. -- 1l2l3k ( talk) 23:24, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Your latest edit at Linda Sarsour broke the 1RR restriction that applies to the article. Please self-revert or you may be blocked from editing. — MShabazz Talk/ Stalk 23:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- @ Malik Shabazz: How so? I have only 1 revert there. Where is the second? -- 1l2l3k ( talk) 23:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- I'm self reverting, just in case, assuming your good faith with this matter, :-). -- 1l2l3k ( talk) 23:35, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- I'm really not sure why you would ever think that a literal exact duplicate of a section should go in an article twice? There's already consensus reached on the talk page as to the material and where it belongs. Please engage in that discussion if you disagree.
NorthBySouthBaranof (
talk) 23:37, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- I'm Ok with the current version. --
1l2l3k (
talk) 00:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- Sincere apologies. You're right. The restriction was changed on 19 November. Before that, it prohibited an editor from restoring material that was removed within 24 hours. See
WP:ARBPIA#General 1RR restriction, particularly the last superseded version. Again, sorry. —
Malik Shabazz
Talk/
Stalk 00:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- No worries, Malik. Eventually mine wasn't a happy solution. --
1l2l3k (
talk) 00:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- The
edit page warning still clearly states that
If an edit is reverted by another editor, its original author may not restore it within 24 hours of the first revert made to their edit
. So either you knew all along that the ARBPIA restriction had been amended, or you simply thought you could get away with edit warring. I'll leave it up to others to judge which is more likely. — Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 02:31, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- The
edit page warning still clearly states that
- No worries, Malik. Eventually mine wasn't a happy solution. --
1l2l3k (
talk) 00:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- Sincere apologies. You're right. The restriction was changed on 19 November. Before that, it prohibited an editor from restoring material that was removed within 24 hours. See
WP:ARBPIA#General 1RR restriction, particularly the last superseded version. Again, sorry. —
Malik Shabazz
Talk/
Stalk 00:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- I'm Ok with the current version. --
1l2l3k (
talk) 00:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
On 14 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Qerim Sadiku, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Qerim Sadiku, an Albanian Catholic saint, said "Long live Christ our King. Long live Albania!" just before his execution? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Qerim Sadiku. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Qerim Sadiku), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 12:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
- Reviewer of the Year
This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
- Thanks are also extended for their work to
JTtheOG (15,059 reviews),
Boleyn (12,760 reviews),
Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews),
Semmendinger (8,440 reviews),
PRehse (8,092 reviews),
Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews),
Abishe (4,153 reviews),
Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and
Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.
See also the list of top 100 reviewers.
- Less good news, and an appeal for some help
The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
- Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019
At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
- Training video
Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion to merge the article Tabiti into Scythian Religion: /info/en/?search=Talk:Tabiti Squatch347 ( talk) 14:49, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg)
wish you a Happy Christmas & a prosperous 2019 Alex-h ( talk) 20:35, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 |
Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 22:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
- News
- The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the {{ rough translation}} tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.
- Discussions of interest
- Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons ( Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page ( Discussion).
- {{ db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 ( Discussion)
- A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
- There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
- Reminders
- NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
- NPP Tools Report
- Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
- copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
- The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately
1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news –
subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
- WMF at work on NPP Improvements
Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
- Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
- Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
- Reliable Sources for NPP
Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
- Backlog drive coming soon
Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
- News
- Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models ( WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.
- Discussions of interest
- A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
- There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
- What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250
Stay up to date with even more news –
subscribe to The Signpost.
Go
here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) on behalf of
DannyS712 (
talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
- WMF at work on NPP Improvements
More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.
- QUALITY of REVIEWING
Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.
- Backlog
The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.
- Move to draft
NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.
- Notifying users
Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.
- PERM
Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.
- Other news
School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.
Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.
Stay up to date with even more news –
subscribe to The Signpost.
Go
here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
- Backlog
Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
- Coordinator
A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
- This month's refresher course
Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
- Deletion tags
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
- Paid editing
Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
- Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
- Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
- Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
- Not English
- A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
- Tools
Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.
Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.
Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.
DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
You and I had a discussion last year on my Talk Page at User talk:Narky Blert/2018#A barnstar for you! 4.
There is an open WP:RM discussion in which you might be interested at Talk:Peć#Requested move 12 August 2019. It seems to have been going on for ever. I have no strong opinion, and have not contributed (though I lean towards Peja).
In any event, I assume that you and I can agree that 'Pec' instead of 'Peć' is just plain wrong; 'c' and 'ć' are different letters, no matter what some English-speaking editors might think. Narky Blert ( talk) 23:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.
- Getting the queue to 0
There are now 811 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the
NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some
really cool awards.
- Coordinator
Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.
- This month's refresher course
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.
- Tools
- It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
- It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
- Reviewer Feedback
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.
- Second set of eyes
- Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
- Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
- Arbitration Committee
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.
- Community Wish list
There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.
To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
- Reviewer of the Year
This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rosguill ( talk) | 47,395 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Onel5969 ( talk) | 41,883 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | JTtheOG ( talk) | 11,493 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Arthistorian1977 ( talk) | 5,562 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | DannyS712 ( talk) | 4,866 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | CAPTAIN MEDUSA ( talk) | 3,995 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven ( talk) | 3,812 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Boleyn ( talk) | 3,655 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Ymblanter ( talk) | 3,553 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Cwmhiraeth ( talk) | 3,522 | Patrol Page Curation |
(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)
- Redirect autopatrol
A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.
- Source Guide Discussion
Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
- This month's refresher course
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
- Source Guide Discussion
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
- Redirects
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
- Discussions and Resources
- There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
- A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
- A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
- A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.
- Refresher
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
- Your help can make a difference
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
- Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
- Discussions and Resources
- A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
- Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
- A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
- Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
|
| |
| Two years! |
|---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:08, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Please note that disambiguation pages like Church of Saint Roch are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:
- Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
- Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
- Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
- Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
- Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
- Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
Thank you. Leschnei ( talk) 12:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
- Year in review
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DannyS712 bot III ( talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Rosguill ( talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | John B123 ( talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Onel5969 ( talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | JTtheOG ( talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | Mcampany ( talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven ( talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Mccapra ( talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Hughesdarren ( talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Utopes ( talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
- Reviewer of the Year
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
- NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
| New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
Hello 1l2l3k,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.
In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 811 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 861 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself
here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
- Backlog status
At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 [a] at the end of May.
Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size. [b]
In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).
While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).
- Backlog drive
A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by
buidhe and
Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up
here.
Barnstars will be awarded.
- TIP – New school articles
Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.
- Misc
There is a new template available, {{
NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:
Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 14910 articles, as of 02:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot
There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.
- Reminders
- Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
- If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing
{{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page. - If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
- To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
- Notes
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 10:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
| New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
( t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
- Backlog status
After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.
Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.
- Coordination
- MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.
- Open letter to the WMF
- The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.
- TIP - Reviewing by subject
- Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.
- New reviewers
- The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.
- Reminders
- Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
- If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing
{{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page. - If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
- To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi 1l2l3k,
- Invitation
For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
| New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
( t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.
Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.
Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.
Suggestions:
- There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
- Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
- Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
- This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.
Backlog:
Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Hello 1l2l3k,
- Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
- 2022 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly
explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your
common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
| New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
Backlog
Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.
Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.
Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp connect on IRC.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Hello 1l2l3k,
The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.
Reminders:
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
| New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long
Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
| New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello 1l2l3k,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
| New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)