- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 21:51, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
OFK Jugović Kać
- OFK Jugović Kać ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Despite the storied history, this club does not appear to meet WP:FOOTYN or WP:N. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:28, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:29, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 20:37, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Severely fails WP:GNG Puffin Let's talk! 23:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:06, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:06, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:06, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - very low level, regional football club, no evidence of satisfying WP:FOOTYN let alone GNG. Fenix down ( talk) 16:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.