The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Neither of the keep arguments are particularly persuasive. Smartyllama states that this is an academy of a major soccer club, but it's not clear how that make this notable. And ATrain asserts that there is online coverage, but doesn't cite any specific sources. --
RoySmith(talk) 15:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Youth sports league which fails
WP:GNG and
WP:BRANCH, almost all youth leagues are non-notable, and "[a]s a general rule, the individual chapters of national and international organizations are usually not considered notable enough to warrant a separate article - unless they are substantially discussed by reliable independent sources that extend beyond the chapter's local area."
SanAnMan (
talk) 15:26, 12 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:28, 19 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
Spiderone 13:11, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - no evidence of notability.
GiantSnowman 18:58, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep It's not a youth league or a local affiliate of a national organization. It's an academy of a major soccer club. As neither reason specified in nomination is actually true, I don't know what there is to discuss here.
Smartyllama (
talk) 20:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 21:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - per nom
Spiderone 12:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. The nominator of this AfD (and several other like it) seems to have mistaken MLS professional development and reserve teams for "youth leagues" -- this and all of the other AfDs from this crop are fundamentally misinformed. Current references in the article are, unfortunately, all to 1st party sites but there's absolutely no shortage of coverage of the team and its players online.
ATraintalk 23:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.