The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 00:51, 20 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Plenty of unsourced additions from UPE/COI editors, but nothing turns up in
WP:BEFORE. Based on the facts that their online articles/stories are very poorly written (see the one added as a source by a new account in an article I created only yesterday
diff), their online about page lists two people, their efforts to use Wikipedia for promotion, and because I have never before seen any reliable source cite this magazine, I see no reason to presume notability. Contrary to what the article says, the last report from Press Council had this magazine in 'B' class. Usedtobecool☎️ 10:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Some mentions in passing, nothing in-depth, plus a lot of the coverage is about an older, different magazine that existed at least in the 1970s. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 10:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.