From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of neuroscience databases. (non-admin closure)UY Scuti Talk 18:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Neuroscience resources

Neuroscience resources (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This isn't really what Wikipedia's for, is it? I can't think of a policy off the top of my head, but I'm sure it falls foul of one of them- we can't have an "article" which just links to news sites about neuroscience and blogs. jcc ( tea and biscuits) 20:43, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:50, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:50, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:50, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:50, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  18:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.