From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Northern Antarctica ( ) 00:34, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Nepal national under-17 football team

Nepal national under-17 football team (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable junior football team with non-notable players, fails WP:GNG JMHamo ( talk) 23:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo ( talk) 23:39, 25 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Not notable? The team is playing at a major international tournament this fall, which leads to the U17 World Cup. Ayoopdog ( talk) 03:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Team will be playing in a continental international tournament. See Category:Under-17 association football, there seems to be clear consensus from the large number of articles that teams competing at that level in this age group are inherently notable. Needs expanding with sourced prose rather than deleting. Fenix down ( talk) 08:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - the under-17 team plays in a World Cup, I'd say that was a sufficient claim to notability. Giant Snowman 13:13, 26 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep – this U-17 team represents for a country. The team plays at the major tournaments. Banhtrung1 14:10, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.