The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 14:39, 1 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Najran 1-2 Hajer

Najran 1-2 Hajer (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I really do not think that the fact that hardly anybody could be bothered to trolley along to watch this match makes it notable. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:50, 25 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —  JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 19:44, 25 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. —  JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 19:44, 25 July 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete - just having a very low attendance does not make a match notable, especially given that, as the article notes, this was nowhere near the lowest attendance recorded (see this for example) -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 07:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude ( talk) 07:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete - even if low attendance was something that would make a match inherently notable, this game is nowhere near the lowest attendance. no indication that the low attendance garnered any real coverage that would satisfy GNG anyway. Fenix down ( talk) 07:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 17:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete Low attendance is not notable. Elspamo4 ( talk) 00:23, 29 July 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.