The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep – Subject clearly meets
WP:GNG criteria with lots of Turkish articles about him and his activities. I have added a couple of them to the article. Kind regards.
Wikipractitioner (
talk) 21:48, 15 September 2023 (UTC) <-- Confirmed sock of
User:TEB001Aintabli (
talk) 18:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Aintabli (
talk) 05:09, 22 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 05:05, 29 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Hope to see some editors join this discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 05:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. There appears to be enough secondary sources with independent significant coverage already cited in the article to pass
WP:GNG. Without a source analysis from the nominator, I am not seeing a strong argument for deletion.
4meter4 (
talk) 05:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. The deletion rationale was that the article did not meet
WP:GNG. With the 11 sources (up from 5 at nomination) currently in the article, it meets GNG.
Jacona (
talk) 17:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.