The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:47, 16 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Mousehole A.F.C.

Mousehole A.F.C. (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the requirements of WP:FOOTYN#Club notability Cabayi ( talk) 11:02, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Cabayi ( talk) 11:02, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Cabayi ( talk) 11:02, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep won promotion from a tier 11 league to a tier 10 league in 2015/16 — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnTombs48 ( talk • contribs) 06:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete - Although Mousehole won the division in the 2015–16 season, they were not promoted because they did not apply for promotion. This means they are still playing at Level 11 of the English football pyramid, not at Level 10. —  Jkudlick •  t •  c •  s 07:32, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete - never played in the top ten levels of the English football league system or a national cup. Try again if they win the league again and actually opt to go up this time........... -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 08:11, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 10:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication of any participation in a national competition. No indication of any other achievements garnering sufficient significant independent coverage to satisfy GNG. Fenix down ( talk) 17:45, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete - in agreement that it fails WP:FOOTYN Spiderone 09:51, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.