From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:47, 9 July 2017 (UTC) reply

MeWe

MeWe (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant promotion. Press release. non-notable startup. nothing significant about it. Light2021 ( talk) 20:23, 2 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 20:29, 2 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 20:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Searches are made more awkward by unrelated similarly-named companies, but I am not seeing better than start-up propositional coverage for this social network, including a passing mention among "Startups Vying for Hype at SXSW" in 2016 ( [1]  – via  HighBeam (subscription required) ), for example. Nor does Alexa just past 50,000th in the USA indicate better for attained notability. Fails WP:NWEB, WP:GNG. AllyD ( talk) 20:56, 2 July 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.