The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. The nom hasn't even bothered with
searching for sources as these have all been nominated within seconds of each other. No objections to speedy renomination by anyone except the nom.
(non-admin closure) –
Davey2010Talk 01:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)reply
'Keep: Entry in Who's Who plus other backing.
Ross-c (
talk) 17:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. His many honours easily push him over the notability bar. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 16:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.