The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Then you wouldn't mind adding some sources to corroborate notability?
Adam9007 (
talk) 15:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Regardless of notability, I can't
verify the existence of Marchant. Probably the best bet for doing that would be the archives of the
South Wales Echo from ~1949-51 (when he seems to have been active, according to our
article here). Unfortunately, I don't have access to those, and the Times and Sunday Times archives I do have access to don't turn up anything from searching...
Caeciliusinhorto (
talk) 17:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Does not deserve an article since no verifiable sources pop up on a simple google search.--
Account2235 (
talk) 20:18, 7 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Oh right. If you can'r google it, it does not exist. I've added a couple of refs. Since I think that football is one of the least interesting things on this or any other planet I've no idea how reliable they are.
TheLongTone (
talk) 15:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep I've added some references and a basic infobox to cleanup the article somewhat. Definitely passes
WP:FOOTBALL.
Kosack (
talk) 12:53, 13 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Although I'm not surprised that a basic Google search doesn't provide clear evidence of significant coverage in independent reliable sources of a person whose notable career ended more than 60 years ago, I am surprised that some of you failed to find evidence of Mr Marchant's existence: all three web references currently present in the article come from the first 17 results of the Google search linked above. cheers,
Struway2 (
talk) 13:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Subject satisfies
WP:NFOOTBALL. What are we to gain by deleting articles that satisfy our subject specific criteria?
Mattythewhite (
talk) 21:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.