From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 21:00, 11 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Margarita Bowl

Margarita Bowl (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An orphaned, largely un-sourced article on what appears to be a non-notable series of TV events. Outside of the IMDB pages linked here, searching brings up very little. Basically, I found a one-sentence mention in an article about Superbowl marketing, and Floyd Little very briefly mentions that he played in it once in his autobiography. Neither mentions are substantial enough to pass the WP:GNG. However, not being an expert on Football, I'm bringing it to AFD rather than PRODing it, as more knowledgeable editors may have better luck at source finding. Rorshacma ( talk) 19:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma ( talk) 19:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma ( talk) 19:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma ( talk) 19:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. I agree with the nominator's rationale. This is WP:NOT. Wm335td ( talk) 21:27, 4 November 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete seems to only contain information that can be found at IMDB, and that makes this article 100% redundant.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 13:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Fails WP:GNG with lack of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Willing to reconsider if such coverage is presented. Cbl62 ( talk) 19:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, Per above, not significant coverage,fails notability. Alex-h ( talk) 14:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.