The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 00:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable manga Mr Senseless ( talk) 23:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge and Redirect - Chris lk02 Chris Kreider 19:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable elementary school. Mr Senseless ( talk) 23:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 10:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Yet to release an album, no assertion of notability 9Nak ( talk) 23:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by Kurt Shaped Box as pure vandalism. Bencherlite Talk 00:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Multiply recreated article under various spellings; the claims to have won two Grammy Awards are not borne out by the official site [2] and the other claims seem equally specious. Let's have this hoax gone once and for all. Accounting4Taste: talk 23:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge. The merger has been accomplished and the page redirected. Nonadmin close. Xymmax ( talk) 19:33, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable elementary school. No predijuce to redirecting to the district article if one exists. Mr Senseless ( talk) 23:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge / redirect Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 06:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I nominated this article for deletion back in November, and it still establishes not a shred of notability, and has no real references. The use of this fictional drug is already covered in the seasons articles, and doesn't warrant its own article. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 23:39, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 00:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Dicdef and OR. Can't see how this can ever be usefully expanded beyond a dicdef because of the regional variations, which is currently pure OR. Travellingcari ( talk) 21:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was - Delete Chris lk02 Chris Kreider 19:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
This article was prodded before but the tag was removed. There is no assertion of notability, at least what would make it different from other thousands of clubs that don't have their own articles on WP. Could be mentioned in the article about music competition though. Tone 23:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 10:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable collage micropower radio station. The station most likely can be heard for a mile or so. Only real claim to notability is it can heard on the local cable system. There is also a COI as one of it's DJ's has been making a number of edits to the article. Ridernyc ( talk) 23:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment I found this in the Wikipedia:Verifiability published in university presses- a college newspaper article would fall under that category.-- Sbkbg ( talk) 17:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment no need to merge as the topic is already covered in Bowling_Green_State_University#Student_life. Ridernyc ( talk) 04:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment/Keep
News Corporation owns a variety of newspapers and magazines and also owns many radio and TV stations. if a newspaper did an article on the station it would be considered independent. I guess if you delete this article we'll have to delete half of wikipedia. just because to separate and independent media outlets are owned by the same company doesn't make them primary sources.--
Sbkbg (
talk) 20:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. Punkmorten ( talk) 09:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The page is only one sentence, and while many locations are notable, I am not sure if this falls under that criteria. Please correct me if I am wrong. Polarbear97 ( talk - contributions) 23:09, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 10:48, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails to establish sufficient notability; page was created as vanity, and involvement with major projects appears to be more tangential. No references show him to be covered by multiple independent reliable sources. Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 23:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect. — Scien tizzle 16:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Explicitly fails future film notability guidelines. Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 22:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was - Keep - I added a {{ expand}} tag to the article. Because it is a stub does not mean it should be deleted. Chris lk02 Chris Kreider 19:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
This place of worship is simply not notable. -- Eliyak T· C 22:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment no question that the article is currently nothing more than a phone book listing but there appears to be some coverage that's not limited to events held at the synagogue. Someone needs to check these before it can be determined it's entirely not notable. Travellingcari ( talk) 15:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was - Keep Chris lk02 Chris Kreider 19:21, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I have a few reasons for nominating this. First, it is a page on a quote by Roosevelt that obviously hasn't made in into mainstream WWII discussion (They call it the Big Three, not the Four Policemen). Second, the article is of poor quality - more than half of it is a quote, and nothing on this article really stands out as something that needs its own article. Also, due to the source of the 'Four Policemen' quote it does not look like there is going to be any more added to this article, other then what is here (In the year of this article's existence, there has only been six edits outside of the original, and looking it over it doesn't look like they did anything more than correct some spelling mistakes.). Thirdly, I have a nagging suspicion that this whole article was created just to prove a point in the arguement about the World War II infobox (About the inclusion of major combatants), that can be found here. Plasma Twa 2 ( talk) 20:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC) reply
So is there a consensus to have this merged into something? If so, I think Allies of World War II is the best article for it. If there was ever a Big Three article, then it would probably be best in there. -- Plasma Twa 2 ( talk) 08:16, 23 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 10:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is unreferenced, I cannot find reliable references, article appears to be a WP:COATRACK for talking about solely the nutritional benefits of the drink. EJF ( talk) 22:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy redirected per discussion. Non-admin closure. -- Dhartung | Talk 08:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
There's no valid reason for a separate article to have been created for this submodel already wholly covered in Chrysler Aspen. Neither article cites any source for the potential release of this model in 2009, and as this model hasn't yet been released, the "2009-present" production date in the infobox makes no sense and the article as a whole borders on speculation. We don't have separate articles for the Chevrolet Caprice and the Chevrolet Caprice Classic and the Chevrolet Caprice Classic LE; this is the same situation. — Scheinwerfermann ( talk) 22:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Bongwarrior ( talk) 09:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Recently deleted under CSD A7, non notable online version of Capture the Flag, no sources except to the developer's websites. Mr Senseless ( talk) 21:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 00:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Previously speedy-deleted several times as spam. It's arguably no longer spam, but I don't see any indication that this product is notable. NawlinWiki ( talk) 21:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete by User:Philippe, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 23:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non notable local fraternity. Mr Senseless ( talk) 21:12, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 01:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Questionable notability is the reason why I am nominating this, maybe it is the highest level for Canadians if they don't get to win that many medals as even the United Kigdom would, but this has been written by an user with COI issues, as for the highest level, 900 ghits would not justify notability as this is my pure reason. Knock-Off Nigel ( talk) 21:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge. Non-admin closure. Shalom ( Hello • Peace) 04:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete and/or merge to De-Loused in the Comatorium. Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:BAND. It appears he was a friend of a notable musician, who died when they were in a garage band together. An tribute album, of sorts, was released. Do not see why he would warrant his own article as he died prior to the notablity of the musican was established. Endless Dan 20:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 03:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
bunch of copyvio stuff, only one decent source Caldorwards4 ( talk) 02:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy deleted by Slakr. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 • Talk 05:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I would say that it does not assert notability per WP:SCHOOL because it is an elementary school and not a secondary school, and the school is not notable for any particular achievements. Gary King ( talk) 20:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 01:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
There is no indication that this is a notable feature. It is used by a few notable companies and organisations (see Talk), but that does not make SurveyEngine notable, since notability is not inherited. A ecis Brievenbus 20:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Read the journals - they refer to the software - not the company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pfrancois ( talk • contribs) 23:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Not sufficient verification to substantiate notability. Tyrenius ( talk) 01:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I can find no reliable sources for the existence of this painter. The sources provided go to the main page of a website that isn't searchable, as far as I can tell, so even if the information is really there, I can't find it. There are only 11 Google hits for "Julian Z. Gilbert", most of them to ebay sellers attempting to sell his works, which, surprisingly, are not the "portraits" that the article says he's noted for. And this may just be my eyes, but the signatures on those works don't look like "Julian Gilbert" to me. There is only one non-Wikipedia hit for "Julian Zangwell Gilbert", and that's to a forum page. The article itself is a part of the Vitus Barbaro hoax. Corvus cornix talk 19:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
SAVE Let me express a fair opionion of what should be done with this article. First off, the artist's work was clearly listed on ebay as "Julian Z. Gilbert", so there is no problem of those works being attributed to him. 2nd, the images themselves were added by Joel Gilbert, a relative, so there is no issue about copyrights. 3rd, to even have works published into lithographs means one is noted - just like an author being published - therfore by nature notable. 4th, there is no such thing as a Vitus hoax, the person has been proven to be real- so it was always a misunderstanding, rather than a hoax, with also further evidence showing that confussion was just be the work of hackers posting fake IP's. finally, the sourcing provides all information where poeple can get catalogues themselves and see the formal listing of the artist- a valid source
Mctrain (
talk) 22:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
You have every ability to contact the Wikipeia account labeled as "Joel Gilbert" when the pictures were added- talk to that person before you make false assumptions. Mctrain ( talk) 22:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
SAVE google as the standard of noteriaty is not a valid basis for removal. Google searches only pull up names that have been added to internet articles or listings- hardly relevant. Therefore, googling as a means of inclusion of Wikipedia is a bogus position and not valid to any discussion of inclusion on Wikipedia. Mctrain ( talk) 22:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
When it comes to art resumes' listing who they studied under is a big deal Mctrain ( talk) 00:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete g1, obvious hoax, or WP:SNOW if you prefer. NawlinWiki ( talk) 21:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Almost assuredly a hoax. The only Google hit was the contribs page of the author. Sadly, no speedy-delete criteria exists for this, so off we go to AfD. - Realkyhick ( Talk to me) 19:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), clear case made for notability and verifibility of website. Darkspots ( talk) 00:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Doesn't seem like a notable enough website for WP, and plus the claim about it being such a notorious "jihadist" website seems a dubious contradiction when other sources say it is a tool of Saudi intelligence. I could be mistaken but considering the lack of good sources and the contradiction, I suggest delete. Khorshid ( talk) 19:32, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 10:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Mainly an advertisement for the article's subject, isara.org. I was part of this article's creation; however, as there are no reliable sources and the page reads more like an advertisement then anything, it fails WP:WEB. Also, the Isara page originally was a redirect to Ishara, [13] but was edited by User:Ginafish to be about Isara.org. [14] -- SyntaxError55 talk 23:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep, as the article has been sufficiently cleaned up and reliable sources have been demonstrated to exist — αlεx• mullεr 19:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
This is blatant advertising to me: mass links, writing, bolding.(not anymore) It fails
WP:MUSIC too, no coverage in
reliable sources, only trivial mentions in media according to
[15].
Cenarium (
talk) 18:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was speedily deleted at 23:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC) by Philippe ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Non-admin close. cab ( talk) 01:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Prod removed by IP. Non-notable game that someone made up one day. faithless (speak) 18:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 10:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Disputed prod; Non- notable direct-to-video film with no reliable sources (IMDB is not a reliable source). Accounting4Taste: talk 18:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep, as reliable sources have been added during the AfD to demonstrate notability — αlεx• mullεr 20:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete this boutique fails WP:CORP. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 18:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete nn voice actress, no sources and minor roles, fails WP:BIO & WP:N, so nn we don't know where or when she was born, where she grew up, went to school, career, etc., the things one expects in a living person's biography. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 18:25, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. While it may be appropriately merged into the parent article, there is no consensus to delete. A merge discussion may take place as per Help:Merge in article talk space. -- Moonriddengirl (talk)
The result was Speedy delete, an obvious hoax. Amir E. Aharoni ( talk) 21:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Completely unsourced, and Google yields no hits. Red ZionX 18:03, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:N. Google new search gives no hint [18]. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 17:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete no indication that this ride is notable Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 17:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I don't even know if balloon race is the technical name for that type of ride anyway.Not notable —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhockey10 ( talk • contribs) 22:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 01:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Cites no sources, and does not seem notable. Red ZionX 17:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Bongwarrior ( talk) 09:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Maybe the issue is that this is a forthcoming flag? Well there was an entry for a forthcoming Kosovan flag in Wikipedia for a long time before the current one was chosen? Why? I imagined it was to let everyone know that there was soon to be a flag chosen for the impending state of Kosovo i.e spreading knowledge - and if memory serves that article mentioned, a flag design competition. This was held under the auspices of the United Nations backed Kosovan government, logically therefore Wikipedia could have been accused of advertising the Kosovan government and its competition. This would have been rather daft though - how could one describe the forthcoming flag without describing the body and process involved in its inception? I seem to recall that there was even a link to an Internet page where one could read all about the competition and even find out how to enter...this seems eerily familiar.
As with the Kosovoan flag, which had an empty space pending the final outcome, I added an empty image for the flag of Gloucestershire - my intention being to update the page with the chosen image, just as happened with Kosovo. Thus, those consulting Wikipedia would not only be aware of the forthcoming flag but will also get to see what the successful design will be.
If people feel strongly opposed to either Gloucestershire, the High Sherriff, or being kept informed of ongoing events - go ahead and delete. —Preceding Vexilo comment added by Vexilo ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Both sides make good arguments here, but in the end, this does have sources and as as much of a "meme" as some of the other faux-religions that have articles on Wikipedia. The Placebo Effect ( talk) 13:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Non-admin closure. Jfire ( talk) 06:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete nn company; the 2 articles do not provide significant coverage - more mentions that venture capitalists are funding competitors for Google and Xerox Parc is in that hunt too. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 17:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I didn't intend to create this article. I thought I was editing a pre-existing article that had been deleted. If you poke around in the dustbins of Wikipedia edit history, there have been a couple of articles created about Powerset. They have been deleted because of notability and significance, but those versions were pretty amateurish and lacked references. Even more problematic is that some of them contained language that smacked of hype or marketing. I wanted to create a simple article with objective, verifiable information and references to back it up (a real encyclopedia entry, not a plug for the company). I'll add a few more references, but with three articles form the mainstream press (NY Times, Business Week, and the Washington Post), I think there's a pretty good argument for notability or significance. Stuartprobinson ( talk) 21:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, WP:SNOW. No point in dragging this out. Neıl ☎ 16:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Aside from the fact that this article is incredibly poorly written, it appears to be about a cartoon that is either entirely nonexistent or at least very, very non-notable. A quick Google search doesn't bring up anything relevant. While there do appear to be a few cartoons made to the song, they're all fan creations and I can't find any suggestion that the Beatles' ever made a cartoon for the song. The only functional external link is to a site selling memorabilia, which has no mention of any cartoon. Natalie ( talk) 17:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Bongwarrior ( talk) 09:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete nothing indicating notability of this company per WP:CORP and it's only been around for a year; and given the viral nature of our WP:BAND criteria, if this is notable, all artists who have 2 releases through them are suddenly notable too! Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 17:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:05, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Apparently non-notable HS music group, despite having a 50th reunion. Per WP:CORP, Organizations whose activities are local in scope are usually not notable unless verifiable information from reliable independent sources can be found. Travellingcari ( talk) 17:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 03:52, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I see no evidence via the article and only some via Google (and no RS coverage) of his notability. There's a chance his book would pass, but it doesn't have an article to merge this to. I don't see evidence of notability outside the book, the current article is his resume. Travellingcari ( talk) 17:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 01:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Nominator forgot to create this page. Sbowers3 ( talk) 17:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
This breed has no register or club and looks as if only one person actually breeds them who is located in Scotland. This cannot be a real breed and it seems this article is being used to advertise the one breeder who is breeding these dogs. -- Exhaustfumes ( talk) 17:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:MUSIC. Simple searches yield no notable information. Delete Undeath ( talk) 16:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 01:35, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
This article is original research, a violation of WP:NOT#OR. Orange Mike | Talk 16:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Not one single citation and User:Watcher, who created the article, has not logged in since 2004. Rob ( talk) 17:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
As the article currently stands, it only links to two other self-referential primary sources affiliated with the Church of Scientology. I checked to see if I could find any mention of this work in secondary WP:RS/ WP:V sources. I could find zero mention of this work in any archived news sources, after searching in 2 different databases. I could only find a brief mention in a "works cited" section in one book, I Thought I Was the Crazy One: 201 Ways to Identify and Deal with Toxic People, by Ruthie O. Grant. This is not enough to assert notability, and certainly not enough to have any semblance of an article with discussion in secondary sources. It should be deleted as non-notable, with no significant discussion or coverage in secondary sources. Cirt ( talk) 16:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment I have made a promise not to edit or vote on deletion of any Project Scientology articles. However the people above make good points. There are about 200-300 other Scientology articles on WP that should also be deleted. There are only a few thousand active Scientologists in the world, plus a few thousand more people whose main interest in life is going on the Internet to criticize/make fun of them. So the amount of coverage WP gives the topic is way out of line for its real world importance. Steve Dufour ( talk) 07:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable artist; fails WP:MUSIC. Recommend Delete along with associated albums. // Chris (complaints)• (contribs) 16:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Completely unverifiable. Out of the three external links that actually deal with hybrid rudiments, one is no longer there, one is a geocities site, and the other is just a personal website from some engineering major from Minnesota. Also, many of the ones listed are complete neologisms (cheesy pancakes, threesomes, and Doctoral Theses, for example, all have people who have claimed to invented them. Even the ones that DO have descriptions are almost nothing but pure jargon. Evan Seeds ( talk)( contrib.) 04:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Fine by me. I just created this article to get the hybrid stuff out of the "rudiments" article anyway. IMHO most of what is in there is total crap. BTW, while you are in the process of deleting worthless articles, check out on the ones on Moeller Method, Snare technique, and Open, closed, open. Brad Halls ( talk) 03:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable artist on barely notable record label. Recommend Delete, along with associated albums. // Chris (complaints)• (contribs) 16:39, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete A7 by User:NawlinWiki, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 20:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non notable upcomming online awards show, completely unsourced. Violates WP:CRYSTAL and WP:WEB Mr Senseless ( talk) 16:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Note: Accidentially an identical nomination was made at the same time. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 16:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete a7, a1, some kid who's working on a book to be self-published. NawlinWiki ( talk) 16:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete No WP:RS, fails WP:BK. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 16:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete author requested deletion. Pegasus «C¦ T» 14:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod; removed by author. Article seems to be a personal essay that fails WP:RS and WP:V. It may also fail WP:N. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 16:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Ok delete this i was just trying to add some information for people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andre maier ( talk • contribs) 13:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete as the article doesn't fulfil WP:MUSIC. — αlεx• mullεr 20:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band. Speedying the band member articles which constant mostly of two sentences. - Warthog Demon 03:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep Happy Editing,
Dusti
talk to me 18:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:20, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Google news has no hit [31] fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 16:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Response: I am confused why this page has been marked for deletion... because it doesn't appear in Google News? Notably, the Google News site for India. What criteria is that?! Am I misunderstanding something?
Having now reviewed portions of Wikipedia's deletion policy and what "does not belong", my personal opinion is that this page belongs in Wikipedia as it serves as a record of an ongoing public event that garners attention in the media, is organized and participated in by a number of highly respected photographers as well as amateurs, and the photographs taken for the event / competition are generally considered to be very tasteful and highly artistic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrdavidson ( talk • contribs) 16:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Response: I appreciate the point about promoting an event. My personal view on NITH is that it is a respected cultural event and exercise in art and photography that deserves to be documented. For what it's worth, that I am not involved in, do not compete in (it's by invitation only), nor do I benefit from the event. Sporting events are often added to Wikipedia, and I don't really see how reporting on past events is any different. Goodness knows that major sporting events are profit centers, the promotion of which I could see as being objectionable, whereas my understanding is any procedes from the NITH exhibition are (in part?) donated to charity. That's subject to verification -- again, I'm not involved. I'm just an admirer of the concept and the work of the photographers involved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrdavidson ( talk • contribs) 18:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Response: I thought of this page as a work in progress... I would like to add more information to it... but in light of the above, I frankly have nothing to gain by arguing further. Go ahead and delete. I never imagined that creating a Wikipedia page would be so disheartening. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrdavidson ( talk • contribs) 03:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Djsasso ( talk) 05:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:MUSIC with a dash of WP:CRYSTAL. Jauerback dude?/ dude. 21:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete Happy Editing,
Dusti
talk to me 18:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
Non admin closure is not available with a delete result. Relisting to garner further consensus as it is not unanimous.
The result was delete.-- Kubigula ( talk) 17:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
While the dictionary he edited might be notable (it's a red link but not sure if it was never created or deleted), I don't find any evidence that he is. A search is hard due to an apparently common name, but an attempt at refining didn't provide much. I know that authors pass if their book has been covered widely in outside sources, but I'm not sure the same applies to an editor. Also the edition doesn't appear to have received widespread coverage, and it's unclear whether he worked on any other. Travellingcari ( talk) 19:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. If someone actually wants to go through with the merge I'll provide the contents of the article. Wizardman 18:07, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Article deprodded in March 2007, AFD suggested instead. Article suffers from a lack of third party sources, and is a large original research synthesis. Although it appears there are many references, these are (almost) all drawn from the primary source. Although this can be argued to be an acceptable practice (I'd do it myself), in the absence of these "sources" there is nothing to demonstrate any notability of the article subject itself. The topic of religions in A Song of Ice and Fire is covered somewhat tangentially in the main article, and there would be little relevant content that could be merged that would add to the encyclopedic quality of the main article. Nick Penguin( contribs) 18:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:23, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
There are a few news hits but they link to reviews he wrote, not anything about his published works. A book search is primarily false positives, with the possible exception of the horror compilation. An LOC search doesn't indicate promise. I see no evidence he passes WP:BIO for creative professionals. Travellingcari ( talk) 18:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
No evidence whatsoever that he meets WP:BAND Travellingcari ( talk) 20:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Does not seem to meet WP:BIO. Google for "Heinz Rudolf" -kunze does not yield sources. Lea ( talk) 22:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
No sources, there are zero Google hits for Mymelody Molly Jones and only two for Peeraporn Thapviwat, neither of them a reliable source. I freely admit that the transliteration from Thai to Latin characters may make this difficult to search for, but if she's now living in the United States and is a well-known Elvis impersonator, I would expect to find some evidence of it in English. She isn't listed on imdb as an actor for the Point of No Return episode of "That's So Raven" - http://imdb.com/title/tt0720491/ "Thai Achiever" magazine, which is used for references, has no web presence. That's not necessarily a problem, except that if this magazine does exist, the references just to the name of a magazine do no good, they require issue numbers. Corvus cornix talk 03:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Tikiwont ( talk) 10:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Concern was: "Neologism with no reliable independent sources; suggest deletion per WP:NEO / WP:NOT#OR." This term has no Google hits and no Google Scholar hits. The article has no reliable independent sources to substantiate its content or establish notable usage. -- Muchness ( talk) 16:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Canon EOS. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable commercial product. Completely unreferenced, no clear claim to notability other than being a product of a notable company. Wikipedia is not a digital camera guide. Wikipedia is not a Canon catalog. Mikeblas ( talk) 15:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Canon EOS. Source article and destination talk pages tagged accordingly. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable commercial product. Completely unreferenced, no clear claim to notability other than being a product of a notable company. Wikipedia is not a digital camera guide. Wikipedia is not a Canon catalog. Mikeblas ( talk) 15:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. There is no consensus to delete this article. While there may be reason to merge, there is not sufficient consensus for a merger to close this AfD with that result. Arguments to merge are arguments to keep, albeit in a different article. If that outcome is still desire subsequent revision and sourcing, merger can, of course, be proposed and carried out as per Help:Merge. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable commercial product. Completely unreferenced, no clear claim to notability other than being a product of a notable company. Wikipedia is not a digital camera guide. Wikipedia is not a Canon catalog. Mikeblas ( talk) 15:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 01:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete nn neologism per WP:NEO Mayalld ( talk) 15:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete nn alledged full-time writer who actually appears to be an unemployed blogger Mayalld ( talk) 15:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), A strong case has been made that this article meets the standard of Wikipedia:Notability (music). Darkspots ( talk) 00:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Dubious claim of "national recognition and success" 9Nak ( talk) 15:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was close and relist semi-protected due to the ongoing disrutpion by a sock farm ( CU). - Jéské ( v^_^v +2 Pen of Editing) 16:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
ATTN I WOULD LIKE THIS ARTICLE TO BE JUDGED BY THE WIKI List of India-related deletion discussions
List of India-related deletion discussions -- 99.238.6.68 ( talk) 11:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Strange essay, on highly controversial topic, making highly controversial statements. Given reference link is faulty, it is copypasting of newsarticles rather than direct references. Soman ( talk) 15:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
User:Soman is not allowing others to Contribute. User:Soman is disrupting important information that was requested by Politicians and others to create. All refferences with pages have been provided. User:Sonam seems to be incooperative by nominating important articles and related articles which must be made. User fails to understand Recent Activties and Joint Operations which have been taken place recently. -- Indra10 ( talk) 08:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Article must be known and included as part of LTTE joint terrorism it is reccomeded that the article is known because LTTE is providing training to Maoists and sponsoring them as well. Article also has refferences. It is the only article that shows the relations with other Militants its a reccomended article by Politicians -- Thileepanmathivanan ( talk) 00:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
User:Soman Fails to Provide recent and upto date information . This page was created on Recent Activities that had taken place just a while ago. I am just contributing and am sure it will eventually expand.
Here, Gatherd Information from News and Other Sources
Refferences
There are indefinite amount of resources too many and i garuntee 100% this article is going to expand.
User:Soman is just picking on articles i have created and nominating them for deletion and my articles are all information that are most upto date. I did nothing wrong i am just contributing like any other Wikipedian. -- 99.238.6.68 ( talk) 11:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Keep -- Information seems to be popular on Google as well. -- ThambeEeE ( talk) 11:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
*Keep Yes. enna ? watchdogb orey oru Tamil pulli . dai anna sollu unakkaga. soman vesay lossu penn ketta. This article is the truth bara pundaaeyyy --
Tamilagam (
talk) 11:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC) —
Tamilagam (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
reply
*Keep article may be useful in future. --
Raninder (
talk) 04:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC) —
Raninder (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
reply
Keep - Ok Taprobanus add it then. Put it on
LTTE page --
Raninder (
talk) 14:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
Note -- Article should also be put in Nepal Maoists article and CPI too -- Raninder ( talk) 14:58, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Here Gatherd some more References from the RajayaSabha Goverment Politic Line from their website and Sri Lankan Website that provides Ref to all articles posted
and here are some more regular News Updates on the Relations
http://www.profilesinterror.com/updates/2006_04_23_archive.html
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20050710/world.htm#4
http://naxalnaxalitemaoist.wordpress.com/category/news/
Theres too many. Its that popular and should be notable -- Jawan101 ( talk) 11:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC) — Jawan101 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
I'm copypasting a comment I did on the article take page, regarding given links: "On references:
Intelligence sources [my emphasis, who are they?] informed that the entry of Tamil refugees from Jaffna (Sri Lanka) to Malkangiri five years back could have [my emphasis, note speculatory tone] established the link between Koraput Naxalites with Tamil cadres who later established their links with LTTE."
Members of the village militia in AbujmarhThe LTTE connection is being suspected because of the liberal use of landmines and pressure bombs. These were initially used in Andhra Pradesh but are now being deployed in Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand to attack politicians and security personnel.
The Maoists support the LTTE as also the separatist campaigns in Kashmir and the North-east which they term “nationalist movements.” The CPI (Maoist) is listed at 27 on the Union Home Ministry’s list of banned organisations." Speculatory tone, 'connection is being suspected', speculations on link between CPI(Maoist) policy of national selfdetermination.
-- Soman ( talk) 14:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)" reply
-- Soman ( talk) 12:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC) reply
go through website * http://www.spur.asn.au/latest1.htm all the refferences on each article that is posted on there is provided-- Jawan101 ( talk) 13:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC) reply
go throught the Politic website http://rajyasabha.gov.in/resume/206/obituary.htm - it says shri Anand Sharma raised a matter regarding open Press Conference by CPI (Maoist) in a village on Indo-Nepal border on the 14th December, 2005 and its links with LTTE and Maoists of Nepal. and further more. that is from Indian Politic website thats pure Refernce —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jawan101 ( talk • contribs) 13:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC) reply
This is from the Naxal Maoist Website. and Their Link with LTTE
http://naxalnaxalitemaoist.wordpress.com/category/news/ - Go throught that too -- Jawan101 ( talk) 13:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC) reply
you fail to go through many Refs i provided i can get more and go throught them properly -- Jawan101 ( talk) 13:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC) reply
-- Sikol99 ( talk) 11:29, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Note Wiki Admins users : Soman and utcursch are both Sikh Extremist that are Racist towards Hindus becuase of past conflicts. They contribute only for Bad Faith towards us. they have multiple accounts as well. -- Sikol99 ( talk) 11:39, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:33, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
forking of Communist Party of India (Maoist) Soman ( talk) 15:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Article Indian Maoists is based on current data base and is totally different than Communist Party of India (Maoist) this Indian Maoists is a party that was formed just recently in and was requested to be put up by politicians. Article is not a copy of Communist Party of India (Maoist) it is based on its own points. You can have a look for yourself and judge it is different than CPI maoists.Article also has Refferences which are based on the information provided -- Thileepanmathivanan ( talk) 23:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
User:Soman fails to Provide recent and upto date information . This page was created on Recent Activities that had taken place just a while ago. I am just contributing and am sure it will eventually expand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.6.68 ( talk) 11:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
ATTN I WOULD LIKE THIS ARTICLE TO BE JUDGED BY THE WIKI List of India-related deletion discussions
List of India-related deletion discussions -- 99.238.6.68 ( talk) 11:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete (just housekeeping here) Will ( talk) 23:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Given the extensive and repeated discussions on this issue of possibilities like this, this discussion will run for the full five days usually alloted for such discussions, please don't ask for an early closure. Given the contentiousness of the underlying issue and the repeated requests for things of this nature, a strong community consensus on the issue needs to be established. |
This is a POV copy of an existing article - it is a version of the Muhammad article that confirms to Islamic thinking on the viewing of images of the prophet - how many and where is an important question – but it’s not answered by throwing every element of good practice we have out of the window! . A precedent cannot be allow to be set, where does it end - a copy of the penis article with no pictures? maybe copies of articles that mention G-D rather than God. This is a redundant article and should be speeded out of existence. Fredrick day ( talk) 14:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 03:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Not notable per WP:BK. Veritas ( talk) 14:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Nice improvement, and consensus indicates that new sources are enough to warrant a keep. -- PeaceNT ( talk) 15:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability. His discography is WP:NN... if he is a musician (I can't actually tell) then he fails WP:MUSIC/ WP:BAND. In general, article's subject seems very WP:NN. Scarian Call me Pat 17:22, 15 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was consensus was to Delete. -- VS talk 12:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Slash magazine is does not meet the notability standards ([{WP:N]]) and does not assert this with references. Completely unreferenced article. Boomgaylove ( talk) 05:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Deleted per CSD#G7. Chetblong T C 01:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I didn't think this fit into any speedy deletion criteria and to me it looks unnotable and/or like a copyvio. — Taggard ( Talk) 14:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Keep. While the article is rife with peacock words and praise, and in dire need of cleanup, references, and other such things, it also brings up several Google hits as a volunteer cavalry squad, which is notable. Red ZionX 17:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Wrong language. If its possible to move this to the correct language maybe it should be. Nekohakase ( talk) 07:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Ryan Postlethwaite 23:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
A few useful contribs, but looks like an advert, also no referenes and unsure about notibliity RT | Talk 21:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
A young researcher in linguistics, but not satisfying the notability criteria for academics: his list of publications includes only specialised conferences and local publications, which makes him unlikely to be an important figure in his field (yet...). I would infer from the article and his CV that he his currently a PhD student. Schutz ( talk) 13:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Neıl ☎ 11:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete google search shows 295 hits [42], but none of them prove notability. Fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 12:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Keep The article should be fixed, not deleted. Let's put the trigger fingers away - WP:INSPECTOR Bardcom ( talk) 14:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment Several of the Google searchs provide secondary sources, therefore it passes WP:N. I've editted the article and included more information. Please re-review the article. Bardcom ( talk) 18:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Has not made an appearance in a fully professional league, so fails WP:BIO. robwingfield « T• C» 12:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 01:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Has not made an appearance in a fully professional league, so fails WP:BIO. robwingfield « T• C» 12:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete per CSD A1 - No Context to identify the subject. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 13:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to grievous bodily harm. Non-admin closure. Jfire ( talk) 06:16, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Idiosyncatic, unreferenced, original research. There is no "medical idea of grievous bodily harm" distinct from the legal and common-sense concept, and the article goes downhill from there into a series of tropes specific to a now-banned user. An article on grievous bodily harm already exists to deal with the normal meaning of the term: I suggest that this article either be made into a redirect to that term, or deleted completely. The Anome ( talk) 12:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ryan Postlethwaite 23:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
First, it was in Portugal. I've translated it. And I see, that it is an advertisement of a Biomapa project! So it fails WP:NOT. I think it is needed to be deleted - Wikipedia is not for adverts! Kubek15 - Talk, Userboxes, Contributions 11:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedying. -- Golbez ( talk) 18:25, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NPOV and possibly WP:NOR. Reads like an essay. Only source is a blog and the text seems to have been copied from it. See here. Ascidian ( talk) 11:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus, defaulting to Keep. Black Kite 23:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete 5 hints in Google search when searching as Ballacraine railway station [45] and 5 hints when searching as Ballacraine Halt [46]. Fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 11:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G11. ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 20:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:BIO. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 10:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, but Jtrainor is right when he points out that there's no deadline. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:17, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:FICT. Also question of WP:OR. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 10:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Speedy keep and tag for expansion It was only created two days ago. Give it time. It's rather a little bitey to nom it only ten minutes after creation.
Though it is my personal belief that it is probably better to merge it. Jtrainor ( talk) 06:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 20:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:BK. Google search shows many hits, but no reliable source establish its notability. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 10:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete: recreation of AfD-deleted article. Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 12:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete No WP:RS. Should be deleted per WP:MUSIC and WP:CRYSTAL. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 10:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, doesn't seem sufficiently notable as a corporation — αlεx• mullεr 20:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I previously deleted this as db-spam, it's been recreated and now reads less like spam, but still doesn't demonstrate notability unless a precedent has been set that being listed on the Nasdaq is notable. Khu kri 10:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Bongwarrior ( talk) 09:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable living person; appears to be self-promotion. This article was tagged does not cite any references or sources in April 2007. Chrisieboy ( talk) 10:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedied as G11 (advertising). No non-primary sources, reads like spam. Black Kite 23:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:N. 160 hits in google search. [50]. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 10:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment: Currently Google gives 187 hits for "Algorego".(2008.02.22) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Viesturz ( talk • contribs) 09:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- slakr\ talk / 11:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 10:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Carioca ( talk) 02:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#A7, deleted by Od Mishehu at 14:16, 20 February 2008. Non-deleting admin closure. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 15:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:CORP. No third party reliable source. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 09:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator, no other support for deletion. — David Eppstein ( talk) 19:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Reluctantly nominating for deletion. The article was created by
User:Blofeld of SPECTRE, who is an excellent wikipedia editor, and created many articles in various topics. But unfortunately this article do not meet the general notability criteria. Lack of award, or third party sources, hence fails
WP:BIO. A google search gives 78 hits
[51], but do not prove notability.
Otolemur crassicaudatus (
talk) 09:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
I am withdrawing my nomination per above comments. I will like to see the article being improved. I think members of WikiProject Norway can help in translating source. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 14:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Well I'd like to see somebody expand it first. I think this afd was valid given the current situation . ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 14:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Mm, as with thousands of others. I have proposed some kind of Wiki Translation - for the wikimedia project to venture into free translation in tens of languages. As yet Jimbo hasn't responded to me, but for me inability to translate from the less common language sis one of the biggest obstacles to universal information on wikipedia. I;m think ing about making a formal proposal. I strongly think the wiki project needs to do something about developing this as an educational tool ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 14:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Yeah, a taskforce for translation is needed. It is especially important while dealing with articles related to non-English speaking countries. It can be proposed as a separate formal policy, or voluntarily. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 15:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Non-admin closure. Jfire ( talk) 06:21, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete per WP:MUSIC and WP:CRYSTAL. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 09:09, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep, and article is tagged with {{ unreferenced}} — αlεx• mullεr 21:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete explicitly fails WP:MUSIC. One hint in Google search - wikipedia [53]. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 09:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
But still sources are lacking. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 11:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, since there's no consensus on the redirect target. Wizardman 17:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:CORP. No WP:RS given. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 09:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:CORP. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 08:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 17:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 08:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:MUSIC. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 08:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- Step hen 02:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete explicitly fails WP:MUSIC. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 08:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Hello, I have been a bit busy of late to tidy it up, but I believe that they are a notable new band. Making a big impact, quickly gaining media attention and impressing crowds on a big tour. They are currently writing new material but shortly taking a break whilst supporting Anti Flag a long standing band. I haven't had time to read the notability guidelines yet. But I may get round to it soon. If the article just needs more references and a bit more info I can do that. If it is purely notability which is the problem, these small UK punk rock bands do not often have a full website with any information, often relying on myspace. I feel that for these bands wikipedia often allows a concise article to be written drawing from the various interviews and other information on the internet. So, wikipedia article often shows highly in search rankings for these bands, giving a nice base for information on these bands.
I doubt anyone else will edit this article, so if any changes are needed or new information added I'll have to do it at some point. So lastly is their any information not included that would allows this article to remain or is it purely since the band are so small? Lastsal ( talk) 14:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep per located references. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete No WP:RS, fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 08:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:24, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:CORP. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 08:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:21, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Has little third party source, most of the references are from the organization's website itself. Fails WP:CORP. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 08:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 08:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Clearly NN. Black Kite 23:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:BIO. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 08:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 18:13, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 08:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I could relist this but it's a pretty obvious result. Wizardman 20:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable "music group (??)" which doesn't even have an album. Nekohakase ( talk) 07:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 01:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Was proded for "unreferenced, no references to be found online." User:Discharging P removed it because (see Talk:Pussyman) "I saw this prod on here, and after reading about how it works, I decided to remove it. I personally know of Pussyman and he is notable, IMO." Still unreferenced and I can't find references online. Ricky81682 ( talk) 07:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Bongwarrior ( talk) 10:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Autobiography of non-notable actor. Tons of references, but no evidence of notability. Recommend Delete. // Chris (complaints)• (contribs) 07:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
ATTENTION
This is not an article about being an actor. Andy is a recognizable name for many reasons as the article well documents.
hold on Being a starter for the University of Notre Dame is considered a major accompishment. Andy is a public figure and recognizable name as both an actor and former accomplished athlete at a historic University. Andy has been on NBC,ABC,CBS,FOX,ESPN,LA Times,Chicago Sun Times, Many other Ap sources, editorials. Andy was also invited to speak at Notre Dame.
ATTENTION
This is not an article about being an actor. Andy is a recognizable name for many reasons as the article well documents.
The article has recently as of Febuary 24, 2008 been cleaned up and tightened. New references have been added and many old ones removed. Spelling corrections were made.
Irish starter at nose guard in 2001,Irish regular at defensive tackle to begin 2000,first-team all-state in '96, brother Jerry USA Today First Team All American on Defense at Jenks, played at Notre dame and with the Chicago Bears and Green bay Packers, Father Gerald 1966 National Championship team, Andy Wisne Performed Stand Up comedy with Lou Ferrigno and Natasha Leggero, Featured in a huge front page Los Angeles Times Cover story in November 27, 2002 about transitioning from football to becoming an actor. Aunt Pam is a four time emmy award winner,Sister-in-law Shannon was an All-American Swimmer at Notre Dame,Performed at the World Famous Hollywood Improv playing Mac Daddy (in Elvis costume) in multiple productions of Ryan Litzinger's "Shakespeare's Punk Rock". Article in South Bend Tribune 2 Day Story,Treated for Bipolar disorder. Andy is now properly medicated and treated,Awarded scholarships to play football from: The University of Notre Dame, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State University, University of Arkansas, Texas A&M, Vanderbilt, Kansas State, Rice, University of Missouri,The Air Force Academy, Baylor, Rice. Also recruited by Harvard, Yale, and Penn, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.231.133 (talk) 00:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.231.133 ( talk)
Please pay close attention to the following listed in Wikipedia-
"check the deletion policy to see what things are not reasons for deletion. Consider whether you actually want the article to be merged, expanded, or cleaned up rather than deleted, and use the appropriate mechanism instead of AFD. before nominating a recently created article, please consider that many good articles started their Wikilife in pretty bad shape. Unless it is obviously a hopeless case, consider sharing your reservations with the article creator, mentioning your concerns on the article's discussion page, and/or adding a "cleanup" template, instead of bringing the article to AfD. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.231.133 ( talk) 00:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply
None of the following were breached- Reasons for deletion include but are not limited to violation of copyright, content that does not belong in an encyclopedia, content not verifiable in a reliable source, and unreferenced negative content in biographies of living persons. In the normal operations of Wikipedia, approximately five thousand pages are deleted each day through the processes outlined below. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.231.133 ( talk) 00:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Irish starter at nose guard in 2001,Irish regular at defensive tackle to begin 2000,first-team all-state in '96, brother Jerry USA Today First Team All American on Defense at Jenks, played at Notre dame and with the Chicago Bears and Green bay Packers, Father Gerald 1966 National Championship team, Andy Wisne Performed Stand Up comedy with Lou Ferrigno and Natasha Leggero, Featured in a huge front page Los Angeles Times Cover story in November 27, 2002 about transitioning from football to becoming an actor. Aunt Pam is a four time emmy award winner,Sister-in-law Shannon was an All-American Swimmer at Notre Dame,Performed at the World Famous Hollywood Improv playing Mac Daddy (in Elvis costume) in multiple productions of Ryan Litzinger's "Shakespeare's Punk Rock". Article in South Bend Tribune 2 Day Story,Treated for Bipolar disorder. Andy is now properly medicated and treated,Awarded scholarships to play football from: The University of Notre Dame, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State University, University of Arkansas, Texas A&M, Vanderbilt, Kansas State, Rice, University of Missouri,The Air Force Academy, Baylor, Rice. Also recruited by Harvard, Yale, and Penn, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.231.133 ( talk) 00:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply
hold on Editing in an area in which you have professional or academic expertise is not, in itself, a conflict of interest- Wikipedia hold on
Andy Wisne is a credited writer and actor. confirmation professional and academic expertise
Using material you yourself have written or published is allowed within reason'- Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.231.133 ( talk) 01:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Andy Wisne is a recognizable name and notable for many reasons as referenced in article. Starter for the University of Notre Dame football team, family football legacy (Notre Dame/NFL legacy, and an up an comming actor featured in the Los Angeles times, featured on NBC halftime special, Chicago times, and many other sources. How is that not notable???
hold on
Jimmy Clausen has a page and he is only a freshman at ND?
See also: Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia original research# Editing in an area in which you have professional or academic expertise is not, in itself, a conflict of interest- Wikipedia
Andy Wisne is a credited writer and actor. confirmation professional and academic expertise
Using material you yourself have written or published is allowed within reason- Wikipedia
Obviously persuasion to delete this article comes from personal uninterest in the subjsect matter at hand. After examining some of the Wikipedia's articles there should be no reason for discussion as listed above- ////Unless it is obviously a hopeless case, consider sharing your reservations with the article-Wikipedia
Reply to below imdb is an official recourse of refrence for professionalism for actors, director, writers, producers- so on. His improv work can be tracked to the LA Connection comedy theatre. I'm sure they have a number on 411. His director of the improv is listed on the imdb biographyof andy wisne at the top. I'm sure the director Dan Weisman will clarify it for you. The names of actors, directors and crew for sitcom 37b and their salary and wages can be tracked to the director Christopher Demanci. His name is listed on imdb. Not only that but there are contracts on hand in which actor and crew signed that he can supply copies of it. I'm sure someone closely connected with each project would have made a phone call by now if the accusations were false. The article will get cleaned up but there is absolutely no reason that an article on Andy Wisne should exist.
hold on Editing in an area in which you have professional or academic expertise is not, in itself, a conflict of interest- Wikipedia
Andy Wisne is a credited writer and actor. confirmation professional and academic expertise
Using material you yourself have written or published is allowed within reason- Wikipedia hold on Reply to above imdb is an official recourse of refrence for professionalism for actors, director, writers, producers- so on. His improv work can be tracked to the LA Connection comedy theatre. I'm sure they have a number on 411. His director of the improv is listed on the imdb biographyof andy wisne at the top. I'm sure the director Dan Weisman will clarify it for you. The names of actors, directors and crew for sitcom 37b and their salary and wages can be tracked to the director Christopher Demanci. His name is listed on imdb. Not only that but there are contracts on hand in which actor and crew signed that he can supply copies of it. I'm sure someone closely connected with each project would have made a phone call by now if the accusations were false. The article will get cleaned up but there is absolutely no reason that an article on Andy Wisne should not exist.
Also Andy Wisne recieved a co-star billing in the Pilot "Sweet Potato Queens" in which he delivered lines to actress Delta Burke. 300 pound Notre Dame football player becomes a 200 lb sitcom actor and has the Los Angeles Times write an article and that is non notable? Gimme a break. Andy chose to put uncredited on the role because he felt he could do better. This could be confirmed with Eddie Winkler (now at ACME Talent and Literary) when and was with him at Buchwald Talent Group. I'm sure they have a pay stub on file
Irish starter at nose guard in 2001,Irish regular at defensive tackle to begin 2000,first-team all-state in '96, brother Jerry USA Today First Team All American on Defense at Jenks, played at Notre dame and with the Chicago Bears and Green bay Packers, Father Gerald 1966 National Championship team, Andy Wisne Performed Stand Up comedy with Lou Ferrigno and Natasha Leggero, Featured in a huge front page Los Angeles Times Cover story in November 27, 2002 about transitioning from football to becoming an actor. Aunt Pam is a four time emmy award winner,Sister-in-law Shannon was an All-American Swimmer at Notre Dame,Performed at the World Famous Hollywood Improv playing Mac Daddy (in Elvis costume) in multiple productions of Ryan Litzinger's "Shakespeare's Punk Rock". Article in South Bend Tribune 2 Day Story,Treated for Bipolar disorder. Andy is now properly medicated and treated,Awarded scholarships to play football from: The University of Notre Dame, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State University, University of Arkansas, Texas A&M, Vanderbilt, Kansas State, Rice, University of Missouri,The Air Force Academy, Baylor, Rice. Also recruited by Harvard, Yale, and Penn,
Jimmy Clausen has a page and he is only a freshman at ND?
Editing in an area in which you have professional or academic expertise is not, in itself, a conflict of interest- Wikipedia
Andy Wisne is a credited writer and actor. confirmation professional and academic expertise
Using material you yourself have written or published is allowed within reason- Wikipedia
This information should be included as it will help many people to never give up on their dreams and to keep going. Including the article is more about the journey of an artist and him wanting to share his trials and tribulations and overcomming them. The story is unique in itself, interesting to the masses, historical fact. Being a Notre Dame legacy is reason enough. The story from the Los Angeles Times introducing Andy as a more prevelent public figure is double the reason. Andy loves what he does and I think any agent, manager, or publisist would make sure the biography of Andy Wisne be included in the Wikepedia. Andy is without representation at the time. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
76.173.231.133 (
talk) 00:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
hold on hold on —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.231.133 ( talk) 01:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC) Editing in an area in which you have professional or academic expertise is not, in itself, a conflict of interest- Wikipedia hold on reply
Andy Wisne is a credited writer and actor. confirmation professional and academic expertise
Using material you yourself have written or published is allowed within reason- Wikipedia
hold on This information should be included as it will help many people to never give up on their dreams and to keep going. Including the article is more about the journey of an artist and him wanting to share his trials and tribulations and overcomming them. The story is unique in itself, interesting to the masses, historical fact. Being a Notre Dame legacy is reason enough. The story from the Los Angeles Times introducing Andy as a more prevelent public figure is double the reason. Andy loves what he does and I think any agent, manager, or publisist would make sure the biography of Andy Wisne be included in the Wikepedia. Andy is without representation at the time —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.231.133 ( talk) 00:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Nuetral point of view was not breached. All information is well documented and referenced
Using material you yourself have written or published is allowed within reason'- Wikipedia
hold on This should have been entered in Wikipedia a long time ago. The author does not matter as long as the facts are truth and that was not breached. All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), representing fairly, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources.- Wikipedia. With this said the featured stories are far more flattering than what the author has wrote. It is a combination of getting respect with much humility. The article could have been much longer than entered. Notable and recognizable name can not be denied. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.231.133 ( talk) 01:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I'm sure the millions who follow Notre Dame football find it comprehensible. Many of those same fans a have watched and are watching Andy Wisne's progress. Just because you can't comprehend it does not mean others do not
hold on Being a starter for the University of Notre Dame is considered a major accompishment. Andy is a public figure and recognizable name as both an actor and former accomplished athlete at a historic University. Andy has been on NBC,ABC,CBS,FOX,ESPN,LA Times,Chicago Sun Times, Many other Ap sources, editorials. Andy was also invited to speak at Notre Dame.
I'm sure the millions who follow Notre Dame football find it comprehensible. Many of those same fans a have watched and are watching Andy Wisne's progress. Just because you can't comprehend it does not mean others do not
The result was delete as the film does fail WP:NFF — αlεx• mullεr 22:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Explicitly fails future films notability guidelines. Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 07:26, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep the main article and merge the others to it (non-admin close).
JJL (
talk) 04:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
Series of articles by the same user which are essentially genealogical entries without any indication of notability. No sources are available online other than this user's personal website. She promised to return to add references, but, alas, never did. Jfire ( talk) 07:25, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 03:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:CORP. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 07:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted at 08:06 by East718 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Non-admin close. cab ( talk) 08:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete no WP:RS. Unencyclopedic. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 07:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. henrik• talk 18:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:CORP. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 07:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Tyrenius ( talk) 00:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:BIO Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 07:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.. Clearly not made up, but not notable either. Black Kite 23:38, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply
No assertion of Wikipedia:Notability, Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day Wongm ( talk) 06:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC) cat=F reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 18:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Hey boys and girls, it's another regional offshoot event of Burning Man. Not notable in its own right, no independent reliable sources to verify anything in the article, appears to promote the event more than inform in an encyclopedic manner. This particular event had total attendance of 60. There's more guys hanging out on the corner down by the 7-11 right now. - Realkyhick ( Talk to me) 06:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 01:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Another regional offshoot event of Burning Man, this one Kiwi style. Not notable in its own right, no independent reliable sources to verify anything in the article. The most notable thing about this one is apparently that the burn almost blowed up real good. - Realkyhick ( Talk to me) 06:26, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List_of_regional_Burning_Man_events. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Yes, ladies and germs, it's another regional offshoot event of Burning Man. Not notable in its own right, no independent reliable sources to verify anything in the article. In fact, there's very little to this article at all. - Realkyhick ( Talk to me) 06:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. If no one can be bothered commenting, I'm taking the nominator's word for it, particular as the author was already deemed non-notable and their article deleted. Neıl ☎ 11:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I found no independent reviews of this book from sources that meet the requirements of WP:BK; the book appears to be non-notable. There are a few reviews on personal websites and forums such as [67] and [68] , and also some marketing posing as a review ( [69]), but no reliable sources. Note that the author's article was deleted for lack of notability around the same time this article was created, and subsequently WP:salted. Jfire ( talk) 05:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was being bold and redirecting. The television series that the character this article is about only started yesterday. It is unnecessary to have an article on the character at this point, because the character surely can't be notable on his own. Should the content of the redirection expand, then there is no reason why the section cannot be expanded into an article.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 06:32, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
This article is about a villain of a new TV series. The speedy deletion of this article is contested. Grounded into a double play ( talk) 05:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Bongwarrior ( talk) 10:16, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
An extremely long, unsourced (because there aren't any) on an entirely non-notable band and its series of mergers. Travellingcari ( talk) 21:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — αlεx• mullεr 23:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable individual with the claim of notability coming from his modelling career, that I can not find substantial support for. The username of the creator implies that this is an autobiographical article and google results for the name come with only four apges, one being this article and one being a log of the creation of this article.
I previously speedied this article but it did have some claim of notability so rather than immediately send it off I have put it here for further discussion. –– Lid( Talk) 04:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect. I've left the history of the article so if there's any content which people feel should be in the Britney Spears article, please feel free to merge it across. Ryan Postlethwaite 23:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The article does not assert Ghalib's notability. See
Relationships do not confer notability
Pinkadelica (
talk) 03:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Redirect Strong delete Because this individual may or may not be dating Britney Spears is the only possible reason for this article to start. In checking notability criteria, it is apparent that this individual, by himself, is a non-notable person for inclusion in Wikipedia. In accordance with
Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Invalid criteria, it states That person A has a relationship with well-known person B is not a reason for a standalone article on A. That is relevant to Adnan Ghalib specifically, as the example given in the guideline is actually the first husband of Britney Spears. Relationships do not confer notability. I believe this article should be deleted and anything regarding Ghalib at this juncture should be no more than a notation in the Britney Spears article and not be accorded a separate article. For the reasons below, and the ones I listed here, I am changing my opinion to redirect.
Wildhartlivie (
talk) 22:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete - Philippe | Talk 04:13, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
the article is about a blogger who seems to be non-notable. the main argument for keeping it is that he's occasionally cited by roderick long. Bob A ( talk) 03:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Burning Man. (Specifically, on closer examination of the parent article, to the sub-article List of regional Burning Man events) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable event, which claims to be a regional offshoot of Burning Man. No reliable sources, only the official web site and a Flickr photo collection. Only 100 participants at a one-time event. I'm checking into other articles about similar events, and I suspect many of them will come up for AfD. - Realkyhick ( Talk to me) 03:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
As a die-hard Burner and a participant in Frostburn, I nevertheless have to agree with Realkyhick. Should Burning Man have an entry? Definitely--it has impacted the culture as a whole and spawned a social movement, as Wiki4noise points out. Larger regionals such as Playa del Fuego, that are nearly a decade old and still growing? Perhaps, but I would like to see that they have had some influence other than that of Burning Man as a whole. Frostburn? I'm less convinced. What about the weekly Burning Man meet-and-greets that take place at Cambridge Brewing Company in Boston? Do they get an entry as well? I mean, you have to draw the line somewhere. I would say that the regional themselves do deserve an entry because they are evidence of a growing social movement, but I would have thought that a list of them should be sufficient, and devoting a whole page to each one seems like unnecessary overdetail.
Notability is defined as the following: "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." If Frostburn is notable, then whether 100 or 101 people attended is not the issue, rather the issue is whether the culture as a whole noticed it (i.e. news stories etc.) Burning Man clearly meets criteria. Frostburn I'm not sure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.133.6.4 ( talk)
The result was delete - no sustainable notability. - Philippe | Talk 04:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I think this directly fails WP:BLP1E as there was nothing notable or extraordinary about the case of this particular woman killing her husband. I PRODed, creator removed it with note one where sources could be found, including one on line. While I don't know anything about the Toronto Sun as an RS, this article has phrasing that leaves me wondering about author professionalism specifically: Paul, I should point out, was one heck of an embalmer and One day, while working over a body, she gave Paul the high sign. He caught it, cherished it, and couldn't wait to introduce his cute colleague to more lively pursuits. The two commenced a prolonged affair. Regardless of source quality, I'm submitting this here for discussion especially reL: WP:BLP1E. Travellingcari ( talk) 20:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 01:46, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable college radio program. I've repeatedly suggested to the editor (who appears to be the DJ who hosts the show) that it should be merged into the article about the radio station, but he keeps removing the mergeto tag so, as I promised, I'm bringing it here. Corvus cornix talk 03:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — αlεx• mullεr 22:33, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Surprisingly, this article has been around since 2004. Must have flown under everybody's radar because it's an unreferenced essay about what an ideal follower is. One possibility is to delete and temporarily recreate a redirect to leadership. Pichpich ( talk) 03:12, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep - Philippe | Talk 04:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable triangle. :-) But seriously, trivial construct that is not commonly known under that name. The article consists mostly of Java and C++ code of no interest whatsoever. Claims of "subtle patterns" are probably intended as a joke. Pichpich ( talk) 03:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - Philippe | Talk 04:07, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
tagged for notability for 3 months no edits have been made to improve the article at all. Looking around I find a lot of Google hits but nothing notable, for example a total of 130 people have listened to their music according to last.fm, with one play for each song in the past week [72]. Beyond that I can't find much more then a few metal blogs reviewing the album. Seems they are not even well known in the metal world since I don't see any of the larger metal sites mentioning them. Ridernyc ( talk) 02:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
*Weak keep.
Grounded into a double play (
talk)
The result was delete - Philippe | Talk 04:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
An article for a skit? Fails WP:MUSIC (as this is a music video skit), fails WP:PLOT TrU Co 9311 02:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep National ranked course, definately notable. Other issues can be cleaned up. - Djsasso ( talk) 22:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I confess to not being a golfer! This article is about a what seems to me to be a non-notable golf club and/or community. I have been unable to find any references from independent sources to suggest notability. A Google search for Estancia golf club returned 70 hits, all of directory entries or real estate sites. There is no suggestion that the golf course (or the community) are any different from any other. Emeraude ( talk) 14:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Bongwarrior ( talk) 10:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Borderline notable Italian fantasy writer, 1,570 English Ghits but very little from reliable sources. No refs in current article, those in it:Licia Troisi are unimpressive - passing mentions. English article has already survived a prod, it may well be possible to demonstrate notability but like I say this one just feels very borderline. FlagSteward ( talk) 02:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Arguments for keep based on notability guidelines are pretty strong. There are some valid concerns about COI and self-promotion (though less so after the cleanup), but those are more editorial issues than AfD issues.-- Kubigula ( talk) 17:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Article was created to self-promote. Enigma msg! 02:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 01:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Seems to be a nonexistent religion, no related G-hits, maybe a hoax? Vivio Testarossa Talk Who 02:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect, though content may also be merged as appropriate. Instructions for merging have been left at the album article talk pages. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:22, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
A long story goes with these articles. Some ELO fans decided to make an article for almost every ELO song released regardless if it wasn't released as a single. At first, I kind of ignored it and waited for more information to be added. Months passed and nothing. I decided to add verifiability templates and it would just lead to the ELO fans reverting my edits. Then, someone prodded the articles and sure enough someone reverted them. Now the articles end up here on AfD. These article above fail WP:N as the song was not released as a single and/or charted on any music charts and I am also including the songs below for the same reasons:
The result was Speedy Keep per WP:SNOW and obvious notability per WP:CORP. (non-admin) brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:12, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Just another low cost carrier, nothing notable about this one. Bananaqueen ( talk) 01:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 01:03, 25 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Is hs wrestling in Louisiana notable? That's the question Bananaqueen ( talk) 01:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 01:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete unsourced article about a road without indication of why this road is notable Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 01:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. notability has not been demonstrated. - Philippe | Talk 04:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod, article does not assert notability. Roleplayer ( talk) 01:32, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. notability has not been proven. - Philippe | Talk 04:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails to satisfy notability criterion, specifically WP:ORG because it has no secondary sources and "Organizations whose activities are local in scope are usually not notable unless verifiable information from reliable independent sources can be found". No independent sources were found on Google or the article itself. This is a generic local organization that is encompassed by Residence hall association Noetic Sage 05:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 01:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Explicitly fails future films guidelines. Indeed, a situation exactly like this is why the guideline was created in the first place. Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 09:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - Philippe | Talk 04:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
This article is about a particular transmission. No sources are provided that explain why this transmission is notable above other transmissions. Perhaps a transmission could be more important to automotive buffs than, say, a starter motor, but in my opinion, without an independent source that establishes notability, this article should be deleted. Blast Ulna ( talk) 07:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 02:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Cannot find any references for this article. The only Palmetto Grand Prix I can find reference to is a 5 km running race. Severo T C 00:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Philippe | Talk 04:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable radio presenter. Portglasgow ( talk) 03:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Philippe | Talk 03:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable. Hardly any ghits. Originally PRODded, but PROD rv by anonymous IP user. Portglasgow ( talk) 02:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Bongwarrior ( talk) 09:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Despite the hype the article gives him, he is nothing more than yet another MySpace artist. Prod removed by author. JuJube ( talk) 00:03, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Thank you for professionalism and patience to everyone involved here. I am new at writing and editing here and am learning a great deal through this process. Gothicrose1970 ( talk) 01:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete A3 by User:VirtualSteve, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 23:45, 19 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Not a notable village. Thebluesharpdude ( talk) 05:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC) reply
It was brought to my attention in good faith that a rationale may be appropriate. It can be found here as a breakdown of the contributions to this discussion. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Clear WP:COATRACK for person with no notability on his own. Notability is not inherited, and being mentioned in a presidential candidate's speech does not make one notable. At any rate, this article uses a weak rationale for notability to squeeze-in WP:BLP-sensitive information that is not appropriate. This is the 8th nomination at AfD for this article, all previous AfD's are linked on the article talkpage. Consensus (or lack of) can change and in this case should. JERRY talk contribs 00:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply