Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Liu_Guangxu References

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:20, 21 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Liu Guangxu

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that the top three flights of chinese football are pro. He has not played in the top flight and the fully pro status of the second and third flights is not confirmed by reliable sources. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 15:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC) reply

I a also nominating the following article for the same reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 15:10, 14 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 15:10, 14 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Delete all - fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 15:20, 14 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:16, 14 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:16, 14 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:16, 14 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Delete all - this discussion suggests League one is an FPL, but there is nothing available to suggest league two, in which all these players play, is fully professional. Happy to reverse my view if sources can be found. Fenix down ( talk) 11:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.