The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The only keep !vote ignored the reasons provided for deletion
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 10:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The separate lists for the individual nations are sufficient; there is no need nor demand for a Nordic grouping.
Spiderone 14:43, 12 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
Spiderone 14:48, 12 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Wikipedia is not a book with an limited amount of pages.--
Snaevar (
talk) 16:48, 17 November 2016 (UTC)reply
I can't see how this can be a valid reason for keeping an article that clearly fails
WP:GNG. By that argument, it would be okay for me to make an article about myself and my friends.
Spiderone 18:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.