The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
JForget 00:19, 5 September 2010 (UTC)reply
Unencyclopedic, tagged with multiple issues for over a year, no references, original research, trivial content
Falcadore (
talk) 14:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete, potentially limitless list, and a magnet for people to add nicknames for their non-notable club with 50 members and its stadium, which is a painted-out field in the middle of nowhere.
Stifle (
talk) 17:36, 29 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete A random list that is impossible to be constrained or dealt with in an encyclopedic way. --
Crunch (
talk) 19:11, 29 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete, completely unsourced, a magnet for vandalism, possibly includes
original research. Team nicknames which are cited in
WP:RS should be and are listed at the respective team's article. --Kinut/
c 19:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete for all the reasons above. Additionally, this article's content, even if well-sourced, would not be considered notable.
Bds69 (
talk) 01:34, 30 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete - per what's already been said, not notable and a magnet for abuse.
QueenCake (
talk) 12:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete - appears to be original research, and fairly pointless at that.
Rlendog (
talk) 02:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.