From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Mirko Vučinić. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 03:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC) reply

List of international goals scored by Mirko Vučinić

List of international goals scored by Mirko Vučinić (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Besides, he has only scored 17 goals. C. Ronaldo Aveiro ( talk) 15:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC) reply
So now you want to withdraw your AfD as you support a merge? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Strong delete and merege. No reason to have this list as its own article. Move the (yes notable) table of goals to the main page Mirko Vučinić! (Not even a link back to the main page at present.) (If this was not listed here I might have just bolded the page straight into the main page section it is linked from!) Each goal itself is not notable. No one would ever write an article about a goal? The goals make the person who scored them notable, so put the goals with the thing they are making notable. Ditto all of these lists. Aoziwe ( talk) 13:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 15:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 18:30, 15 February 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Merge or Keep although merge would probably be more important. The information is relevant though and shouldn't be lost. Inter&anthro ( talk) 20:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.