The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - OR/POV/general nonsense. Not even sure the other article cited is notable either.
GiantSnowman 10:58, 9 August 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete - confusing in terms of inclusion criteria making it hard to tell what should/could go in this list. Clarity of the other article dubious also.--
Egghead06 (
talk) 11:06, 9 August 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete - Original research, unsourced with no inclusion or exclusion criteria.
Mentoz86 (
talk) 22:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete As not meeting GNG and also a dubious inclusion criteria, that could be driven by original research and POV. —
ΛΧΣ21™ 02:27, 16 August 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.