The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Arguments are hardly overwhelming - consensus is to follow precedent and common outcomes. Mojo Hand(
talk) 01:53, 4 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
• Gene93k (
talk) 13:46, 27 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - list of transfers are normally considered notable, this is just a particualrly poor example - no sources, mis-use of flags etc. Needs improving, not deleting.
GiantSnowman 14:43, 27 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - per GS, article is poor but subject matter is generally considered notable.
Fenix down (
talk) 19:17, 27 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - Per GiantSnowman.
IJA (
talk) 18:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.