The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 14:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. —
Jkudlick •
t •
c •
s 05:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete -
WP:NOTSTATS, definitely a club well below the notability level for such a standalone article. A comment on the hat trick record in the club article is all that is needed.
Fenix down (
talk) 15:47, 13 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete -
WP:NOTSTATS, if this was an higher rated club, then I would say a weak keep but its not needed.
Matt294069is coming 00:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete, does not meet
WP:LISTN, as there are no sources that discuss the article information as a whole, also
WP:NOTSTATS, and anyway,
South Hobart FC article is small enough to contain any relevant info under a stats section?
Coolabahapple (
talk) 18:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as nothing at all to suggest its own convincingly independent article.
SwisterTwistertalk 04:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.