The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title while the other entries here aren't valid. The AfD is issued after the PROD tag got removed.
NmWTfs85lXusaybq (
talk) 14:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Pppery, the disambiguation page has been updated and
Limosa (magazine) has been created as a redirect mentioned in its target. If you're fine with it now, please change your vote so that I can withdraw this nomination.
NmWTfs85lXusaybq (
talk) 15:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
OK, but that gives you a hint that at least one other editor thought there was
potential. I know it's easier to just do a huge mechanic cleanup, but sometimes it makes sense to look into these because they're indicative of something else. I just skimmed your list of 200+ prod's and found several situations that could be handled differently. --
Joy (
talk) 10:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Yes, that's what I meant. Unfortunately, it seems that nobody was willing to help check
WP:ONEOTHER candidates in the last month after I tagged 200+ dab pages (of all 1,200+ candidates) with {{One other topic}}, although I have excluded ones resulted from vandalism. Thus, I believe PROD has to be used to draw more attention from our community.
NmWTfs85lXusaybq (
talk) 11:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Yeah, the cleanup tags aren't going to be very effective within just a month at rarely visited pages. Especially in cases where there weren't even hatnote links to some of these. --
Joy (
talk) 12:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
There is now a sourced mention of the magazine at
Sovon, and a redirect there. Still no need for a dab page, a hatnote at the bird would do..
PamD 08:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
I found another item in the title search with an existing redirect, a minor planet, just by scrolling through. There's also mentions of moths, but I'm not familiar with
WP:PTM rules on scientific names so someone else should look at it. Spamming all this into a hatnote at an article that actually has a different title seems like it would be excessive. --
Joy (
talk) 10:24, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Well spotted.
PamD 13:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: adequate little dab page, too much for a hatnote.
PamD 13:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep several valid entries, plus see also section.
Boleyn (
talk) 15:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.