- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. ( non-admin closure) Anarchyte ( work | talk) 09:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Lavender Hill High School
- Lavender Hill High School ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a school without any claims to notability (other than existing) nor any sources to pass WP:GNG. TM 16:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Per WP:SKCRIT #2 - "The nomination was unquestionably made for the purposes of vandalism or disruption" part b. "nominations which are made solely to provide a forum for disruption, e.g. when a contestant in an edit war nominates an opponent's userpage solely for harassment". The nominator nominated this article, on a secondary school which meets WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, immediately after I nominated Theresa El-Amin, which they created, for deletion. Ms El-Amin is a non-notable person and the creator has cited an advertising flier and a self-authored personal directory entry with contact details as reliable sources demonstrating notability per WP:BASIC and WP:GNG. The nom also queried my motives, writing "I'm not sure why the article of a prominent civil rights activist is being nominated for deletion during Black History Month" and then proceeding to nominate this article on an overwhelmingly black secondary school for deletion. AusLondonder ( talk) 16:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Obvious keep as existing is the commonly accepted notability standard for high schools. Gab4gab ( talk) 16:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. CatcherStorm talk 17:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep and the nom should withdraw this revenge nomination. Lepricavark ( talk) 02:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - per criteria 2 as mentioned above. Twitbookspacetube ( talk) 04:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.