The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)reply
No evidence that this meets
WP:NBUILD. That would "require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability". (
t ·
c) buidhe 09:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. What i see is statement, unchallenged, that the church "was built in the late medieval period". And clicking on a link in the article brings me to a page with a map and fairly long text in some language I cannot read. Having an AFD "discussion" among uninformed persons about an ancient--hence probably wikipedia-notable--church is not helpful. --
Doncram (
talk) 01:09, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Georgia/Abkhazia apparently has a great deal of medieval churches if the dates in these articles are accurate. There are apparently no less than four in Tsebelda,
Gulripshi District (the district has a population under 20,000). The churches are all falling down to lack of maintenance, indicating a lack of interest, and no substantial sources can be found on them in any language. (
t ·
c) buidhe 01:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Yeah, right...meaning this sarcastically... as if you converse in
Abkhaz and
Kartvelian languages and as if you have expertly reviewed available sources. As if you are an authority in all languages and all materials everywhere. Sure.... --
Doncram (
talk) 06:32, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
If sources exist you're welcome to list them here. I was not able to find any. Without sources we cannot write an article. (
t ·
c) buidhe 06:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. No sources in the English Wikipedia, no sources in the Georgian Wikipedia.
WP:BURDEN for showing notability and verifiability of the content here lies on those who want to keep this, I'd say. Blithely assuming that an unsourced Wikipedia article is accurate is also "not helpful".
AleatoryPonderings (
talk) 01:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
~ Amkgp💬 20:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.