The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Notable if not for foundin SoulCycle but for becoming head of WeWork.
L3X1(distænt write) 15:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep She is notable because she founded Soulcycle, hence the relevant company info. It may need more biographical info about her education/personal life, but should not be deleted.
User:Ariel Cetrone (WMDC)(distænt write)Ariel Cetrone (WMDC) (
talk) 19:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - The rationale for nominating for deletion makes no sense. "References are all concerning the business": Yes, that's the point. It's a more than $100 million/year business that is one of the most prominent firms that pushed forward the spinning trend in fitness. She is also the Chief Brand Officer of one of the largest co-working concerns in the US, WeWork. --
Fuzheado |
Talk 20:20, 18 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep per Fuzheado. Founder of major business, clearly notable.
Gamaliel (
talk) 20:36, 18 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep per Fuzheado. --
Rosiestep (
talk) 22:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. In-depth coverage of the subject in multiple reliable sources gives this article a pass of
WP:GNG, and the fact that there is coverage both about SoulCycle and WeWork saves it from
WP:BIO1E. There is no requirement, nor should there be, that coverage be about something other than what the subject is primarily known for. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 22:32, 18 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Multiple obviously notable roles and the coverage in reliable sources that comes with that.
The Drover's Wife (
talk) 23:20, 18 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Founder of a notable company, SoulCycle, which ought to have an article. Enough in reliable sources to meet
WP:SIGCOV.
Edwardx (
talk) 01:15, 19 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.