The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not enough detail or citation to specify having a page
Wasabi,the,one (
talk) 22:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep as these are not valid arguments for deletion, article can be easily improved, and I don't quite understand why this was nominated.
Sro23 (
talk) 22:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. This is a fundamental concept in Hindustani music, so we should have an article on it. Admittedly the current article is inadequate, but that's a reason to expand it, not to delete. --
Deskford (
talk) 22:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment: the article mentions that the topic in question forms part of a
raga – I don't know enough about the topic to say for certain, but would it make sense to include it as part of that article?
Richard3120 (
talk) 04:43, 2 September 2016 (UTC)reply
It forms part of the performance of a raga, along with e.g.
alap and
jhala, and indeed sometimes the term "raga" is loosely used to refer to performance, but more strictly a raga is a mode, and that is what our article
raga covers. Better to cover one subject per article, I think. --
Deskford (
talk) 09:18, 2 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.