The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sources presented to support GNG are either
routine hiring / firing reports or are actually the person discussion the club he manages rather than a third party discussing the manager. Nothing has been presented to suggest he has received significant coverage in a number of third party sources per GNG.
Fenix down (
talk) 00:28, 9 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:NFOOTY, having not played or managed in a fully professional league, or played international football. No indication of significant coverage to otherwise satisfy
WP:GNG.
Jellyman (
talk) 21:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:26, 29 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep -
Dundalk F.C. certainly a pro club,
Dublin City F.C. in 2003–2004 potentially also professional as won LoI 1st Div twice in those years,
Drogheda United also a fully pro club, St Pats big club in the country; overall probably enough to satisfy
WP:GNG and through the backdoor
WP:NFOOTYAbcmaxx (
talk) 00:17, 30 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete - the League of Ireland is not a
WP:FPL, so he fails
WP:NFOOTY (fully professional clubs in a semi-professional league still do not meet NFOOTY). He should have coverage somewhere, whether in print or online, from a more than 30-year career in Ireland, but I wasn't able to find any
WP:SIGCOV. Unless someone can find the coverage to change my !vote, I've got to go delete.
21.colinthompson (
talk) 01:29, 30 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep managed Dundalk, one of the most important teams in the country. Coverage is thorough but more on the routine side but still has made national Irish news, coverage on him specifically like so:
[1][2][3] I think there's enough here to keep and heartily disagree with any "fails
WP:NFOOTY" !votes - Gill has to be analysed on
WP:GNG grounds.
SportingFlyertalk 09:49, 30 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dom from Paris (
talk) 18:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:NFOOTY and coverage seems to be typical routine sports reporting.
Papaursa (
talk) 19:11, 6 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.