The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete Poorly sourced promotional article. Not enough evidence of significant notability.
Kind Tennis Fan (
talk) 03:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete heavily promotional with almost no legitimate sourcing
Burley22 (
talk) 00:49, 6 November 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.