The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Daniel (
talk) 02:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)reply
I do believe he does not met notability criterias. No reliable, independent sources. Regards
Kemalcan (
talk) 09:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep This article should not be deleted for lack of asserted importance because... I have explained how Jason Falovitch is a "person of interest." He is an accomplished business man that works with Mark Cuban, Michael Bisping, Roy Hibbert, and Evander Holyfield. This tag for speedy deletion is erroneous, as I have presented why Falovitch is indeed notable in the business world. He owns multiple companies with other well-known people and he runs social media accounts with millions of followers. This tag was put on before anyone even read the page, which is completely unfair. I demand that this page not be deleted. A. Julian 16:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC) confirmed to be sockpuppeteer of the editor below
Spiderone 20:46, 14 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep This
article should not be deleted. The page has a sufficient amount of citations and is well-written. After reading this article, it is quite apparent that Falovitch is certainly notable and has dealt with some very important people. It would be beyond foolish to remove this page; it needs to be kept. IndyBoy
IndianaBoy33 (
talk) 18:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC) striking sock vote
Spiderone 20:46, 14 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - completely fails
WP:BASIC; the only source providing him more than a passing mention is
this, which menafn.com says that they take no responsibility for MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. The article itself is written very, very promotionally.
Spiderone 19:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete no reliable, independent sources. Promotional. --
Kemalcan (
talk) 20:56, 14 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.