The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus is this article needs improvement, not deletion
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 11:21, 26 July 2020 (UTC)reply
91% plagiarism from Library of Congress COPYVIO with this URL:
[1]. Seems to have been that way for years as noted on the talk page.
Netherzone (
talk) 18:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment: The website with the 91% copyvio is souced from the "U.S. Library of Congress", which this article claims to using public domain material from. It may be possible that the url in question is copying from the public domain material, though I can't prove that. Username6892 20:19, 18 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Copyvios should be CSD'd not AfD'd. As for this article, the actual source seems to be the
Library of Congress. The copyright notice is
here. From what I can see, this work is not subject to copyright. So this might be plagiarism, but it wouldn't be a copyvio in that case. You can list it at
Wikipedia:Copyright problems for closer examination.
ProcrastinatingReader (
talk) 20:22, 18 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Thank you for making me aware of that {{u|ProcrastinatingReader]], I have modified my entry above to reflect that.
Netherzone (
talk) 21:01, 18 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment: I believe that Japanese values have changed somewhat since Ruth Benedict did a commendable but understandably flawed job of inferring and describing them circa 1944. And it's her book that much of this curious article currently claims to be based on. --
Hoary (
talk) 01:19, 19 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Blow it up and start over I think this needs some
WP:TNT because it’s a horrible-quality article about a fairly important topic.
Dronebogus (
talk) 00:18, 20 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep Even if this article isn't plagiarism, it should still be completely rewritten. Words can't describe how vague it is. It shouldn't get deleted because it is definitely a notable topic that needs to be part of Wikipedia.
Scorpions13256 (
talk) 09:50, 20 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Scorpions13256, you make the article sound worthless, yet you want to keep it (strongly, even). I don't understand. --
Hoary (
talk) 09:16, 22 July 2020 (UTC)reply
I'm saying that it should not be deleted but completely rewritten. I'm just saying that deleting it altogether seems like an extreme measure.
Scorpions13256 (
talk) 15:15, 22 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. I'm the biggest fan of
WP:TNT, but this one is not terrible. Are there no experts in Japanese culture active here?
Bearian (
talk)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.