The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep.
Missvain (
talk) 21:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Football executive who fails GNG and NFOOTY. Majority of media mentions of him are trivial or passing at best. The article is basically a resume.
BlameRuiner (
talk) 18:56, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
Spiderone 19:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment I see nothing special here for the article to be kept. It reads like a CV and not like a bio.
Govvy (
talk) 20:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - there's decent coverage out there, including
this, and plenty of coverage about his appointment from across the globe that goes beyond NOTNEWS. It needs improving, not deleting.
GiantSnowman 22:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. The head of the governing body of a sport in a major country is generally notable. Plenty of sourcing. It's a normal biography, not a "resume". --
Necrothesp (
talk) 10:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - plenty of reliable sources out there establishing his notability, and as Necrothesp says, the head of a governing body of sport in a country is usually notable. This does not fall into the category of advertisement or resume. Should not have been brought to AfD (and
WP:NOTCLEANUP should be compulsory reading).
Deus et lex (
talk) 11:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
It was actually originally
prodded! Another example, I'm afraid, of how prodding is being misused on articles that are clearly not uncontroversial deletions. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 15:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep and close: I am surprised to find how people are editing the pages from a long time and clear example of editors misusing editing powers. This executive is blindly notable however deleting editor cannot find it, he first prodded it, then he again raised AFD. I will suggest him to first Google about pages and then raise AFD after detailed search, it will help a lot. He seems to be active and really his previous prodded pages needs to be re-evaluated.
2001:8003:4030:7E00:E835:4BBC:551B:EA63 (
talk) 16:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - this passes
WP:BASIC even just from the sources in the article
Spiderone 19:32, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.