From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn.) BigHaz - Schreit mich an 12:41, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Iqram Rifqi

Iqram Rifqi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. While this player has attracted some coverage, he's yet to make his senior debut in a fully-professional league, and such coverage as is present is relatively run of the mill stuff, as I see it. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:53, 18 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Nomination withdrawn per correction from Struway2. I had misread the source discussed there, which caused the initial PROD and eventually the AfD here. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 12:41, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:26, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:26, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:26, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - technically the nom is correct. The subject does not currently qualify under WP:NFOOTY. However, the article indicates that the subject has been promoted to the S League parent team. As soon as the subject takes the pitch against another S League team, the subject will qualify. I recommend holding this, if that is possible, until the end of the upcoming season to see whether the subject does so. Absent an injury or other unexpected issue, the subject is likely to qualify. Another option is for an editor to userfy the article until that time.-- Rpclod ( talk) 03:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply
There's never any objection to re-creating an article once the player involved makes the necessary appearance on the park. Considering that the 2018 season of the S-League isn't meant to start until the end of March (according to its article) and runs until October, that's potentially a very long hold-over period - and, playing devil's advocate, what's to stop the argument being made after that time of "Well, he's been in the squad, just never selected, so why don't we hold that over until the end of next season?" and so on. Userfication may work, as I can see that the article's creator seems to be a keen fan of the league and would presumably be well-placed to update and re-create anyway. That said, I note that the other non-NFOOTY-compliant articles the same user created were deleted via PROD. This is a special case for what seems to be a reason entirely unrelated to the original user or the subject. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 08:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 06:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply
You're entirely correct. I misread that article as being about his appearances in the league below the S-League, rather than the S-League itself. I'll withdraw the nomination and close this one accordingly. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 12:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Iqram_Rifqi&oldid=1070406887"