From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:18, 11 November 2013 (UTC) reply

ISSA DaCosta Cup Football Competition 2013

ISSA DaCosta Cup Football Competition 2013 (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable school competition. Contested prod with no reason given. Contravenes WP:NSEASONS as this is not a top professional league. Competition is merely a school competition and not even a national one.Also contravenes WP:NOTSTATS due to lack of significant sources prose. Fenix down ( talk) 07:48, 31 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 08:22, 31 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 08:22, 31 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 08:23, 31 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Fenix down ( talk) 08:31, 31 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - non-notable, minor competition. Giant Snowman 09:27, 31 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Seems to also violate WP:NOTWEBHOST, in addition to the concerns raised above which I agree with. C 679 09:48, 31 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete for lack of notability. Cheers, Lindsay Hello 16:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.