The result was delete. All the useful content - finalists and winners - are listed in the main article so according to the consensus here, separate article are unnecessary. A redirect is an option but I'll delete all for now. The copyright is not an issue in this case, I believe. Tone 10:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC) reply
I'm nominating a whole set of these (list below). They are bare results from presumably a snooker tournament. Wikipedia is not an almanac of sports results or a directory. I wouldn't have a problem if these had article content, but they're not. They may have even been copy pasted from Snooker database, possibly bringing up some copyright issues.
Shadowjams ( talk) 23:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC) reply