- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:37, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Go Vilnius
- Go Vilnius ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Organisation founded in 2016, only 34 employees. Fails WP:NORG. Could be a redirect to Vilnius. Edwardx ( talk) 15:10, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- EDITED: Delete. The article is likely gonna be frequent guest for moderators because of future edit warring and because it seems to attract promotional COI. Also, on second thought, I agree that it fails notability criteria. 31.192.111.189 ( talk) 20:52, 29 July 2017 (UTC)— 31.192.111.189 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete. The I.P. editor's comment sounds promotional. -- do ncr am 23:30, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. There might be other reasons to delete the article, but notability is not an issue. I just checked and found a lot of Go Vilnius articles in Lithuania's largest magasine Delfi (web portal) (according to Wikipedia) in both [ english] and [ Lithuanian]. I am not familiar with organisation's importance but the fact that Roger Qiu, director of Ctrip, has meetings with Go Vilnius seems to at least indicate some weight and importance (info from a quick Google search) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.29.2.112 ( talk) 20:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC) — 46.29.2.112 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete or Redirect to Vilnius. Per WP:GNG, there needs to be sufficient discussion of the organization in independent reliable sources. There is not. The unregistered editor posting above says that the organization is "the go to source" for tourism in Vilnius, but strangely the same unregistered editor has negative views about people involved with the same organization in the past. MPS1992 ( talk) 21:11, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 16:09, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 16:09, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG, and Vilnius is not a sensible redirect target IMO. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 17:57, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.