The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable item from a non-notable book written by a non-notable author. Eagles24/7(C) 03:17, 17 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete- the reasoning I gave in the PROD is still valid- there's not nearly enough notability for anything in that book to have a separate article.
Bradjamesbrown (
talk) 03:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete - as nominator. Eagles24/7(C) 03:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC) struck redundant opinion of nominator.
Bongomatic 16:04, 23 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Strong delete unencyclopaedic, too short, and non-notable. (Whoever heard if a fictional watch having its own article.) Plus, it is uncategorised and unreferenced. Kayau OdysseyHUCK FINNto the lighthouse BACK FROM EXAMS 04:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete but let's not pile on things that aren't valid reasons for deletion. Non-notable topic.
Drmies (
talk) 04:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete: Non-notable watch in a non-notable book by a non-notable author.
Joe Chill (
talk) 17:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete the book is at least somewhat notable, but not this item.
Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non-notable in-world item from non-notable novel.
Bongomatic 16:04, 23 January 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.