From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:14, 26 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Georgia Cloepfil

Georgia Cloepfil (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 19:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:09, 10 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:09, 10 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:09, 10 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:14, 10 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep While apparently only a small fish in the US, their relevance in Australia would seem to be in the context of a much smaller pond so more relatively notable in Australia. Just as relevant and in depth (!) as many of the other people in List of Melbourne Victory Women players. Her AU team is at top national level in AU. Aoziwe ( talk) 03:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 11:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:22, 18 December 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.