The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The requests to supply sources went unfulfilled.
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 16:39, 28 October 2021 (UTC)reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
assume good faith on the part of others and to
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
Non notable business man and violinist who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them thus a This is s GNG fail. Furthermore a before search turns up nothing concrete. They are a business person and fail to satisfy
WP:ANYBIO. Needless to say
WP:SIGCOV isn’t met Celestina007 (
talk) 22:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Someone deleted a lot of key information in this article and, for example, a New York Times feature article on this person. I've re-added it with appropriate references. --
Ssilvers (
talk) 03:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep but need some more references to back the content. This is my opinion. Thanks.
Billyatthewheels (
talk) 20:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment — So basically you are saying sources exist but are not in the article? Fine, could you point me to these sources? Celestina007 (
talk) 22:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - paid-for spam.
MER-C 10:48, 17 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak keep, sources are barely enough for notability
Jackattack1597 (
talk) 21:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment — Please do you have the sources that substantiate they have in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them? If not you are !voting without substantiating with
WP:RS. Basically, you are saying they are notable without proof, I’m sure that falls somewhere under.
WP:ATACelestina007 (
talk) 22:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
filelakeshoe (
t /
c)
🐱 12:46, 19 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Can't see that there is any significant news here.
Boredathome101 (
talk) 03:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.