- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 16:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Geeks.com
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Geeks.com ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a company, referenced exclusively to its own self-published "about us" page on its own website with no evidence of any reliable source coverage about it in real media. As always, every company is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists -- we are an encyclopedia, not a business directory, and inclusion here depends on passing WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Bearcat ( talk) 17:08, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 22:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 22:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Older reviews have references to coverage in the San Diego Business Journal which wouldn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH. A Slashdot post claims it shut down in 2013, but that appears inaccurate. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 19:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete - Per nom. Stefka Bulgaria ( talk) 20:25, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.