The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC) reply
delete as non-notable: meets no standards for notability under either WP:BK, WP:NMUSIC, or WP:BIO. The article is a translation from French Wikipedia which also provides no sources other than the single book published by Pagnon, and two references in private correspondence of Guy Debord. The description of the contents of Pagnon's book is not sourced and appears to be WP:OR. No secondary sources (let alone multiple secondary sources) commenting on Pagnon or his work are otherwise to be found on Google or JSTOR. Pagnon's book has never been published in English. The article is an orphan. Smerus ( talk) 19:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Geronimo355 ( talk) 19:45, 10 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The book referred to in this article does not meet a single one of these criteria, so our opinion of other people's opinion on it is neither here nor there.
As regards WP:Academic, one person not liking a book in their private correspondence canot possibly be conceived of as raising that book to the 'above-average' notability. On such a basis, everything published would qualify for a WP article.
But in any case, this article is supposed to be (according to its title), not about the book, but about Francis Pagnon, of whom the sourced evidence only tells us that he committed suicide, and almost nothing else. Nothing that Sparafucile mentions indicates that the author and the book are anything but utterly insignificant.-- Smerus ( talk) 08:04, 9 February 2013 (UTC) reply