Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fortune_Lounge_Group_(2nd_nomination) References

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Fortune Lounge Group

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another user thought this a spam, and nominated for speedy deletion - I'm not so sure, as it has some genuine criticism, so I declined it. So, some wider discussion is needed to determine if this article should be deleted for being too promotional. Ego White Tray ( talk) 04:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. ( G· N· B· S· RS· Talk) • Gene93k ( talk) 15:04, 19 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:04, 19 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:04, 19 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Delete. Fails WP:Company and WP:RS. It doesn't appear to have reliable sources. It appears to be entirely sourced with online websites and not what WP considers RS. I didn't find anything in the usual business sources. If more suitable sources are found, I'd change my ivote. SW3 5DL ( talk) 02:09, 21 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:02, 27 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Delete fails WP:CORP. the sources are all primary or promotional. LibStar ( talk) 04:42, 4 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.